Search with Wattson
Activity
 
Notifications
Clear all

Joining the Renewable Heating Hub forums is completely free and only takes a minute. By registering you’ll be able to ask questions, join discussions, follow topics you’re interested in, bookmark useful threads and receive notifications when someone replies. Non-registered members also do not have access to our AI features. When choosing your username, please note that it cannot be changed later, so we recommend avoiding brand or product names. Before registering, please take a moment to read the Forum Rules & Terms of Use so we can keep the community helpful, respectful and informative for everyone. Thanks for joining!

cathodeRay
cathodeRay
@cathoderay
Moderator
Famed Member
Joined: Feb 28, 2022
Last seen: Aug 3, 2026
Topics: 18 / Replies: 2961
Reply
RE: Estimating true heat loss from twelve months of consumption data

@ian33a — a measured heat loss always trumps a calculated (whatiffery spreadsheet) heat loss, providing certain requirements are met. Firstly, the I...

3 months ago
Reply
RE: Setback savings - fact or fiction?

Yes, see below. They are just standard regression lines, just as in any spreadsheet, but in R you have more control and more options, but as I have sa...

3 months ago
Reply
RE: Estimating true heat loss from twelve months of consumption data

Using past oil usage to estimate heat loss is tricky. Firstly it is very unusual to have accurate interval usage. You fills your tank and runs your ...

3 months ago
Reply
RE: Setback savings - fact or fiction?

@jamespa — this version may be marginally better:  

3 months ago
Reply
RE: Setback savings - fact or fiction?

@jamespa — the 0900 2100 IAT/OAT data is now in R and as a starter for ten I have distinguished between setback and setback and hour, 0900 and 2100, b...

3 months ago
Reply
RE: Setback savings - fact or fiction?

@peterwurmsdobler — thank you for your positive comments. You are certainly taking a diligent and sensible approach to assessing your own needs. The...

3 months ago
Reply
RE: Setback savings - fact or fiction?

@jamespa — as a taster, which may in fact already have given us the answer, here is the plot for the whole dataset (no setback/no setback sub sets) fo...

3 months ago
Reply
RE: Setback savings - fact or fiction?

The mean (over the entire range of values) difference is only 20.57 - 19.28 = 1.29°C. At lower OATs this does indeed increase, as the drop in IAT duri...

3 months ago
Reply
RE: Setback savings - fact or fiction?

I do lean to the idea that the main way setbacks save energy is by lowering the daily mean IAT. With careful timing, my setbacks start at 2100 which i...

3 months ago
Reply
RE: Setback savings - fact or fiction?

And finally, the mean daily IAT against mean daily OAT plots. I have broken my 'Y axis must start at zero' rule because on this occasion is may make s...

3 months ago
Reply
RE: Setback savings - fact or fiction?

Meanwhile, I have done the residual plots for the analysis. These are somewhat technical, but in general terms, these plots indicate whether it is rea...

3 months ago
Reply
RE: Setback savings - fact or fiction?

First plot done. Initially I missed the discrete minus sign before the 100 that changes the sign of the percentage differences, but it is inluded in t...

3 months ago
Page 6 / 249
Share:

SPONSORS

Join Us!

Installer Finder

Degrees of Separation

Latest Posts

SPONSORS

Click to access the login or register cheese
Protected By
Shield Security PRO