Joining the Renewable Heating Hub forums is completely free and only takes a minute. By registering you’ll be able to ask questions, join discussions, follow topics you’re interested in, bookmark useful threads and receive notifications when someone replies. Non-registered members also do not have access to our AI features. When choosing your username, please note that it cannot be changed later, so we recommend avoiding brand or product names. Before registering, please take a moment to read the Forum Rules & Terms of Use so we can keep the community helpful, respectful and informative for everyone. Thanks for joining!
Do You Need a Buffer Tank or Low Loss Header for Underfloor Heating in a Large Property?
I have come across someone on another forum who lives in a 300m2 house with UFH throughout. He has a low loss header and 3 pumps on 3 zoned UFH circuits.
My reaction was that the LLH and all those pumps could be causing his problems - e.g. distortion in the LLH, the parallel pumps on the secondary circuits could be fighting each other, especially as they are not hydraulic separated from each other...
However, I am wondering whether I could be mistaken. I have done some searches with Google AI and it came back recommending an LLH based design. The rationale was that the UFH could be several kilometres long. The water pump in the air source heat pump would not have enough power to push the water around the circuits. Therefore extra pumps are required and the LLH is needed for hydraulic separation.
What is the recommended approach for such a large UFH installation?
Grant Aerona 290 15.5kW, Grant Smart Controller, 2 x 200l cylinders, hot water plate heat exchanger, Single zone open loop system with TRVs for bedrooms & one sunny living room, Weather compensation with set back by room thermostat based load compensation
Posted by: @grahamfThe rationale was that the UFH could be several kilometres long.
Well thats a very silly argument typical of AI, it will (or should be) lots of parallel loops joined at one or more manifolds, not one single string several km long! Also it depends on the house. If its modern, very low loss, then less flow is needed than if its a leaky stone pile.
Posted by: @grahamfWhat is the recommended approach for such a large UFH installation?
I cant be certain about that, but the rationale given by the AI is wrong so far as I can see. I guess the answer is 'do the math' for the layout present and loss just like you would do for radiators if there were doubt. Someone used to UFH may well have a feel for the likely answer.
Posted by: @grahamfMy reaction was that the LLH and all those pumps could be causing his problems - e.g. distortion in the LLH, the parallel pumps on the secondary circuits could be fighting each other, especially as they are not hydraulic separated from each other...
Agreed, and the 'call for heat' signal, if there is one, could also be getting messed up unless someone has actually designed the overall control system (which quite likely they have not!). That problem has occurred several times on this forum with mixed radiator/UFH systems where nobody bothered to think through how the separate control systems would mess with each other.
4kW peak of solar PV since 2011; EV and a 1930s house which has been partially renovated to improve its efficiency. 7kW Vaillant heat pump.
@jamespa thanks for your insights on this. On reflection, assuming the same flow temperature which is not necessarily true, the amount of water flow must be about the same, whether you are using radiators or UFH.
Another point is that I may have misled the AI in saying there were 3 circuits. The system has UFH manifolds, so water is flowing in parallel around many loops for each circuit. This must reduce the flow resistance and so make it easier for the water pump(s).
Your point about the control systems is well made and I had already raised that.
Grant Aerona 290 15.5kW, Grant Smart Controller, 2 x 200l cylinders, hot water plate heat exchanger, Single zone open loop system with TRVs for bedrooms & one sunny living room, Weather compensation with set back by room thermostat based load compensation
Posted by: @grahamfOn reflection, assuming the same flow temperature which is not necessarily true the amount of water flow must be about the same, whether you are using radiators or UFH.
Strictly same deltaT is the requirement for same flow rate. I think ufh systems are typically designed for DT5 or same as rads, but can't be certain.
4kW peak of solar PV since 2011; EV and a 1930s house which has been partially renovated to improve its efficiency. 7kW Vaillant heat pump.
The AI answer is one of the cases where if you'd pointed out the error of it assuming one long run, it would reply.
You're quite right in correcting me. Let me explain why. In reality ......
Posted by: @singlespeedThe AI answer is one of the cases where if you'd pointed out the error of it assuming one long run, it would reply.
You're quite right in correcting me. Let me explain why. In reality ......
Indeed. AI, at least the models we have access to, doesn't yet pass the Turing test!
4kW peak of solar PV since 2011; EV and a 1930s house which has been partially renovated to improve its efficiency. 7kW Vaillant heat pump.
@jamespa in some cases, failing the Turing test might be seen as an advantage. 😆
Grant Aerona 290 15.5kW, Grant Smart Controller, 2 x 200l cylinders, hot water plate heat exchanger, Single zone open loop system with TRVs for bedrooms & one sunny living room, Weather compensation with set back by room thermostat based load compensation
- 27 Forums
- 2,792 Topics
- 66 K Posts
- 1,253 Online
- 7,196 Members
Join Us!
Installer Finder
Degrees of Separation
Latest Posts
-
RE: Heat pump branding. Clever, contemporary… or a bit too much?
I think Heat Geek have done an amazing job on their bra...
By Tomtheheatingengineer , 44 minutes ago
-
RE: HeatGeek vs Octopus surveys: puzzling disparity - any ideas why?
I have just had 3 heat loss surveys, one by heat geek o...
By David , 1 hour ago
-
RE: Heat Geek Zero Disrupt: Are We Sleepwalking Into Another Race to the Bottom?
I think that's the key question. After all inverter uni...
By Prunus , 3 hours ago
-
RE: battery storage without solar
As of October 1st they need specific qualifications to ...
By EtchedPixels , 3 hours ago
-
RE: How should the Boiler Upgrade Scheme be reformed?
A unit which uses water to transfer the heat/chill from...
By Temperature_Gradient , 4 hours ago
-
RE: Renewables & Heat Pumps in the News
With regards to the BUS grant raid, I gave it more thou...
By ASHP-BOBBA , 4 hours ago
-
RE: Why are ASHP installs so expensive?
The whole system seems to work on the basis of...
By ian33a , 4 hours ago
-
RE: Missing flow temperature in Heat Geek proposal
Good plan. If you can get half hourly meter readings a...
By JamesPa , 10 hours ago
-
RE: Heat Pumps Without Grants: Would You Have Installed One & Will You Now?
@editor Most certainly. The heat pump was an ideal s...
By Abernyte , 10 hours ago
-
Although regulations may well vary from country to coun...
By Majordennisbloodnok , 10 hours ago
-
RE: Does anyone have experience of a smart water meter?
Yep I caught our slow leak from a £100 bill rise 8)
By EtchedPixels , 10 hours ago
-
RE: Do You Need a Buffer Tank or Low Loss Header for Underfloor Heating in a Large Property?
@jamespa in some cases, failing the Turing test might b...
By GrahamF , 14 hours ago
-
RE: Passiv Smart Thermostat - Help & Forum Support
@energystoragetech The heat capacity of some...
By JamesPa , 15 hours ago
-
RE: tepeo ZEB UK Support & Info Thread
Sorry you are correct, I was remembering figures from t...
By JamesPa , 1 day ago



