Joining the Renewable Heating Hub forums is completely free and only takes a minute. By registering you’ll be able to ask questions, join discussions, follow topics you’re interested in, bookmark useful threads and receive notifications when someone replies. Non-registered members also do not have access to our AI features. When choosing your username, please note that it cannot be changed later, so we recommend avoiding brand or product names. Before registering, please take a moment to read the Forum Rules & Terms of Use so we can keep the community helpful, respectful and informative for everyone. Thanks for joining!
Here is the IAT vs OAT plot with regression lines for each of the four data sets added. I have done them as two plots (one for am, 0900, and one for pm, 2100) because putting them all on one gets far too busy. The regression lines are simple linear ones, y = a +b(x), not polynomial:
Great. I will try to zoom in to work out the deltas between the two lines unless you have an easy way to do that (which would be helpful). The 9pm one (which is arguably the more important) looks like a degree or maybe a bit less? I think @robs has a point about looking also earlier in the evening, although I would have hoped it was pretty stably by 4pm given your setback was 12hrs earlier.
Weather compensation plus my auto-adapt script, which temporarily moves the WCC up or down when the IAT is higher or lower than it should be. The IAT check and WCC adjustment if needed is done hourly, and the increments are one degree ie IAT one degree under, WCC goes one degree up etc, up to a maximum of three degrees either way. The recovery periods will thus be boosted by the auto-adapt script, depending on how far the IAT has dropped during the setback.
Thanks, thats clear.
This post was modified 51 minutes ago 2 times by JamesPa
