Renewable Heating Hub Heat Pump Forums

Search with Wattson
Forums
Renewable Heating
Air Source Heat Pum...
In general - are sh...
 
Notifications
Clear all

Joining the Renewable Heating Hub forums is completely free and only takes a minute. By registering you’ll be able to ask questions, join discussions, follow topics you’re interested in, bookmark useful threads and receive notifications when someone replies. Non-registered members also do not have access to our AI features. When choosing your username, please note that it cannot be changed later, so we recommend avoiding brand or product names. Before registering, please take a moment to read the Forum Rules & Terms of Use so we can keep the community helpful, respectful and informative for everyone. Thanks for joining!

In general - are shorter hotter cycles more costly or longer cooler cycles?

 
Air Source Heat Pumps (ASHPs)
Last Post by JamesPa 2 years ago
4 Posts
2 Users
0 Reactions
1,452 Views
RSS
 Crimson
(@crimson)
Reputable Member Member
Joined: 2 years ago
Posts: 304
Topic starter 06/11/2024 6:11 pm   [#1838]

I'm trying to get to a balance with my system.  I'm starting a new topic as this is quite specific.

Essentially with my system a downstairs zone doesn't perform as well as others due to very short in frequent cycles. Unless I keep upstairs zone open, cycles are more frequent/longer, but then the challenge with that is upstairs overheats/I have to really balance down upstairs which is proving complicated due to different use cases on the first floor (unless I crash down TRVs in bedrooms, bedrooms overheat etc etc).

What I'm finding is that upping the minimum flow temp on the ASHP, lets downstairs get more to temp with these very infrequent cycles (and they seem to be at the moment maybe 4x-6x a day - outdoors ranges from 10-12C here atm).

What I'd like to ascertain is, in theory what would be cheaper to run:

  1. more frequent cycles at a lower temp, but a zone heated that doesn't need it
  2. far less frequent cycles at a higher temp, with just the problem zone calling for heat

 

Difference so far is option 1 with a min temp of 29C, gets to around 19.5-21C (rooms performing differently).

Option 2 is seems to push towards 21C, but the min temp is 32C, so there's a 3C difference in min temp with the WC atm it's a 2C flow temp difference.  Min temp is set to run when outdoors is 20C.  However am seeing the rooms are closer performing downstairs.

Ideal situation would be to rip apart the plant room and optimise the actual temp hitting rads but currently not an option.

 

 

 



   
Quote
JamesPa
 JamesPa
(@jamespa)
Illustrious Member Moderator
Joined: 3 years ago
Posts: 4865
06/11/2024 6:27 pm  

In purely theoretical terms the cooler the flow temperature the more efficient the heat pump is at delivering any given amount of energy, so longer and cooler is better than shorter and hotter - this is a function of the basic thermodynamics (the Carnot equation/cycle if you want to research it)

However your flow temperatures are low, so the thermodynamic efficiency difference may be 2% or less per degree C increase in flow temperature.  You are suggesting only a modest increase of 3C and its quite likely that the thermodynamic difference, particularly at moderate outdoor temperatures, will be dominated by engineering factors.  I think you are going to need to experiment, although it may be difficult to make an accurate determination because you cant control the key variables!

I know that's not very helpful but even with quite long setbacks of several hours its proving difficult to reconcile experimental results (with all their problems) with simple (albeit robust) theory.  Particularly at moderate temperatures the 'engineering' factors, which are difficult to take into account/aren't actually declared by the manufacturers, seem to have a material influence.


4kW peak of solar PV since 2011; EV and a 1930s house which has been partially renovated to improve its efficiency. 7kW Vaillant heat pump.


   
ReplyQuote
 Crimson
(@crimson)
Reputable Member Member
Joined: 2 years ago
Posts: 304
Topic starter 06/11/2024 6:34 pm  

Thanks James.  I'll keep experimenting.  I suspect a spreadsheet that supplements the WC reckoner someone made (apologies every time forget who it was, and it's specific to the Grant ASHP), I'll have to note which temps at ambient temps get me to desired room temps depending on running upstairs along side or not.

Probably a long haul.

Next year I think I'll finally give in to allowing EON to install a smart meter and map against running costs also.



   
ReplyQuote
JamesPa
 JamesPa
(@jamespa)
Illustrious Member Moderator
Joined: 3 years ago
Posts: 4865
06/11/2024 6:41 pm  

Posted by: @crimson
↑

Thanks James.  I'll keep experimenting.  I suspect a spreadsheet that supplements the WC reckoner someone made (apologies every time forget who it was, and it's specific to the Grant ASHP), I'll have to note which temps at ambient temps get me to desired room temps depending on running upstairs along side or not.

Probably a long haul.

Next year I think I'll finally give in to allowing EON to install a smart meter and map against running costs also.

Good idea.  You will probably find that the cycling 'problem' disappears as it gets cooler. Its probably best not to get too intense about this, you could probably drive yourself mad!  Think of it as a slow long walk not a sprint or marathon.

 


4kW peak of solar PV since 2011; EV and a 1930s house which has been partially renovated to improve its efficiency. 7kW Vaillant heat pump.


   
ReplyQuote
Forum Jump:
  Previous Topic
Next Topic  
Share:

Join Us!

Latest Posts

Click to access the login or register cheese
x Powerful Protection for WordPress, from Shield Security PRO
This Site Is Protected By
Shield Security PRO →