Search with Wattson

Notifications

Clear all

Joining the Renewable Heating Hub forums is completely free and only takes a minute. By registering you’ll be able to ask questions, join discussions, follow topics you’re interested in, bookmark useful threads and receive notifications when someone replies. Non-registered members also do not have access to our AI features. When choosing your username, please note that it cannot be changed later, so we recommend avoiding brand or product names. Before registering, please take a moment to read the Forum Rules & Terms of Use so we can keep the community helpful, respectful and informative for everyone. Thanks for joining!

Why Buffer Tanks & Low-Loss Headers Can Sabotage Your Heat Pump's Efficiency

Mars · 2024-01-23T06:00:00Z

Low-loss headers and buffer tanks are routinely specified in domestic heat pump systems across the UK. In many cases they are presented as best practice, a way to protect the appliance, improve stability or simplify installation. The problem is that they are often installed as a default rather than as a solution to a defined hydraulic issue. When used unnecessarily, they undermine the two conditions that determine heat pump efficiency: low flow temperatures and adequate, stable system flow. Heat pumps are most efficient when they operate at the lowest possible flow temperature consistent with maintaining comfort. Every unnecessary increase in flow temperature increases compressor lift and reduces coefficient of performance. At the same time, heat pumps depend on steady, unrestricted water flow through the emitters. The system should be designed so that the heat pump can “see” the full load of the property and modulate smoothly against it. When hydraulic separation is introduced without a clear engineering need, that relationship is disrupted. A low-loss header creates hydraulic separation between the heat pump circuit and the distribution circuit. In theory this protects minimum flow through the primary side and prevents interference between pumps. In practice, it frequently introduces mixing. If the secondary circuit flow rate differs from the primary, warmer flow water blends with cooler return water inside the header. The result is elevated return temperatures back to the heat pump and a reduced effective temperature difference across the system. Higher return temperatures reduce efficiency and can impair defrost performance. The heat pump works harder, not smarter. Buffers are often justified as a way to increase system volume, prevent short cycling or accommodate zoning. There are circumstances where additional water volume is required, particularly in small radiator circuits with low thermal mass. However, most modern inverter-driven heat pumps are designed to modulate output over a wide range. If a system is correctly sized and designed for continuous operation, short cycling should not be a routine problem. Adding a buffer as a precaution frequently introduces standing heat losses, additional pumps, more controls and more commissioning variables. It also creates the potential for thermal stratification and control conflicts between the heat pump and external thermostats. In many poorly performing systems we see the same pattern: a buffer installed to compensate for undersized emitters, aggressive zoning or reliance on on-off room thermostats. The buffer masks the underlying design issue rather than resolving it. Instead of increasing emitter surface area and lowering design temperatures, the system is made more complex. Complexity in hydronic design rarely improves seasonal performance. It increases the number of failure points and makes diagnosis more difficult when things go wrong. The alternative is straightforward but requires discipline. Design emitters for low flow temperatures at design conditions. Ensure pipework and pumps can deliver the required flow rate without excessive pressure drop. Allow the heat pump’s own controls, particularly weather compensation, to regulate output continuously. Minimise zoning and avoid large numbers of motorised valves that fragment the load. Where thermostatic radiator valves are used, they should not routinely throttle down the majority of the system and force the heat pump into artificial low-load conditions. There are legitimate use cases for hydraulic separation and buffering, such as integrating multiple heat sources, managing very small secondary circuits or dealing with legacy systems that cannot be economically upgraded. But these are specific engineering decisions, not defaults. A buffer or low-loss header should be the outcome of a calculation, not a line item copied from a standard schematic. Heat pump performance is determined by fundamentals: low temperature operation, continuous modulation and adequate flow. Anything that interferes with those fundamentals should be justified with evidence. If a proposed design includes hydraulic separation, ask what problem it is solving, how it affects return temperatures and what impact it will have on seasonal efficiency. In many domestic installations, the most efficient system is also the simplest one

Page 24 / 24 Prev

Air Source Heat Pumps (ASHPs)

Last Post by CH_18 7 months ago

279 Posts

32 Users

127 Reactions

61.4 K Views

RSS

Mars

(@editor)

Illustrious Member Admin

Joined: 6 years ago

Posts: 4838

Topic starter 15/02/2026 11:22 am

@ch_18, welcome to the forums.

On the principle first: converting a 4-port buffer into a 2-pipe volumiser on the return is a logical step if your goal is to reduce mixing losses and improve emitter temperature consistency.

On your question about port orientation, in a true volumiser configuration (not decoupled) you’re not trying to achieve stratification in the same way as a buffer. So keeping both the emitter return and the heat pump return on the lower ports can be acceptable, provided the flow path through the vessel is continuous and you’re not inadvertently short-circuiting the top section.

In practice, like @judith alluded to, this is the more conventional way of plumbing in a volumiser.

On the pump question, a 7 kW Vaillant’s internal pump is generally capable of handling a typical single open circuit system provided the hydraulic resistance is reasonable. The fact that it’s currently circulating 1200 litres (I assume you mean system volume, not flow rate) is less relevant than the required flow rate and head. What's important here is whether, once you remove the secondary pump and decoupling effect of the buffer, the internal pump can achieve the required design flow at the actual system resistance. If it can't, you'll drown in flow errors.

🔥 Britain’s Heat Pump Shitshow
How Installing a Heating System Became a National Nervous Breakdown
Free UK shipping.
Rewritten and updated for 2027
📘 From Zero to Heat Pump Hero
🛠️ Bodge Buster
New to heat pumps?
Take the Heat Pump Fundamentals course and use INTRO50 at checkout for 50% off.

ReplyQuote

JamesPa

(@jamespa)

Illustrious Member Moderator

Joined: 3 years ago

Posts: 5358

15/02/2026 11:35 am

Posted by: @editor

↑

So keeping both the emitter return and the heat pump return on the lower ports can be acceptable, provided the flow path through the vessel is continuous and you’re not inadvertently short-circuiting the top section.

Without doing some horrendous modelling, or fabricating some transparent tanks, I would think that there is quite a significant risk that the upper section is effectively short circuited if both connections are at the bottom, particularly if the erstwhile buffer tank was designed to encourage stratification.

There will be some turbulence of course, and a bit of a convection current (hopefully not much if the tank is well insulated) but not a lot really to stir it up. So personally I would go in at the top and out at the bottom even if it makes the plumbing more difficult.

4kW peak of solar PV since 2011; EV and a 1930s house which has been partially renovated to improve its efficiency. 7kW Vaillant heat pump.

👍

ReplyQuote

CH_18

(@ch_18)

New Member Member

Joined: 7 months ago

Posts: 2

15/02/2026 8:07 pm

@editor Thanks for the reply. Yeah I thought in at the top, out of the bottom would be the best solution for converting to volumiser but was hoping to minimise repiping, just incase it doesn't work for example if the internal heat pump circulation pump can't cope.

If you look, I have a spare 2 ports on the left hand side of the buffer. One is about 2/3 of the way up. Would this be a better option? Or does it have to go to the top nozzle?

I have 2 circuits, both open loop. One is supplying approx 120m2 of UFH circuits and the other is supplying upstairs (2 floors) of rads? You think the pump would struggle supplying enough flow?

Thanks again

👍

ReplyQuote

Page 24 / 24 Prev

27 Forums
2,758 Topics
64.9 K Posts
948 Online
7,162 Members

Forum Icons: Forum contains no unread posts Forum contains unread posts

Topic Icons: Not Replied Replied Active Hot Sticky Unapproved Solved Private Closed

RE: Where heat loss surveys seem to go against practical reality

I am amazed that there is not something out there to me...

By JamesPa , 53 minutes ago
RE: Next steps on my ASHP journey: Radiators and Pipework

@bobflux The hydraulic simulator is very interesting...

By Rob of York , 6 hours ago
RE: 7kW EV Charger Options Advice

Thanks. Yes, we have patchy 4G. The only option we had ...

By Rusty , 12 hours ago
RE: Vaillant Arotherm – Using Heating

Batpred thank you

By trebor12345 , 1 day ago
RE: Being screwed over by Volkswagen Audi Group

Thanks, @batpred. That integration is the one I have in...

By Majordennisbloodnok , 1 day ago
RE: How Accurate Is My DIY Heat Loss Calculation?

@batpred I suspect it will be more this year. I had 9 ...

By AndrewJ , 1 day ago
RE: Surface mount or bury primaries for heat pump installation?

@jamespa It's rusting 🙂

By tomasmcguinness , 1 day ago
RE: Glass lined Cylinder for private water supply

Thank you, once again, for your replies. Yes...

By ian33a , 1 day ago
RE: Heat Pump Books For Beginners: The Ultimate Guide to Heat Pumps, Bodge Buster, From Zero To Heat Pump Hero & Britain's Heat Pump Shitshow

It’s been out a few days and Amazon has already attache...

By Mars , 1 day ago
RE: Missing flow temperature in Heat Geek proposal

Yes, and this is another point I agree. We did find a f...

By Batpred , 2 days ago
RE: Problems with sizing a replacement for a Viessmann Vitocal 200-S

A very good point. In effect, the DHW pipework is an em...

By cathodeRay , 2 days ago
RE: Solar Power Output – Let’s Compare Generation Figures

@tim441 Here are those same three month periods for 202...

By Toodles , 3 days ago
RE: Adding additional Solar Panels to a DC coupled battery system

@transparent thank you for your reply above. As alway...

By Old_Scientist , 4 days ago
RE: Adventures in heat loss calculations

@rob-of-york — thanks for posting this, all very useful...

By cathodeRay , 6 days ago

Renewable Heating Hub Heat Pump Forums

Why Buffer Tanks & Low-Loss Headers Can Sabotage Your Heat Pump's Efficiency

SPONSORS

Join Us!

Installer Finder

Degrees of Separation

Latest Posts

SPONSORS

Members Online