Search with Wattson

Notifications

Clear all

Joining the Renewable Heating Hub forums is completely free and only takes a minute. By registering you’ll be able to ask questions, join discussions, follow topics you’re interested in, bookmark useful threads and receive notifications when someone replies. Non-registered members also do not have access to our AI features. When choosing your username, please note that it cannot be changed later, so we recommend avoiding brand or product names. Before registering, please take a moment to read the Forum Rules & Terms of Use so we can keep the community helpful, respectful and informative for everyone. Thanks for joining!

Why Buffer Tanks & Low-Loss Headers Can Sabotage Your Heat Pump's Efficiency

Mars · 2024-01-23T06:00:00Z

Low-loss headers and buffer tanks are routinely specified in domestic heat pump systems across the UK. In many cases they are presented as best practice, a way to protect the appliance, improve stability or simplify installation. The problem is that they are often installed as a default rather than as a solution to a defined hydraulic issue. When used unnecessarily, they undermine the two conditions that determine heat pump efficiency: low flow temperatures and adequate, stable system flow. Heat pumps are most efficient when they operate at the lowest possible flow temperature consistent with maintaining comfort. Every unnecessary increase in flow temperature increases compressor lift and reduces coefficient of performance. At the same time, heat pumps depend on steady, unrestricted water flow through the emitters. The system should be designed so that the heat pump can “see” the full load of the property and modulate smoothly against it. When hydraulic separation is introduced without a clear engineering need, that relationship is disrupted. A low-loss header creates hydraulic separation between the heat pump circuit and the distribution circuit. In theory this protects minimum flow through the primary side and prevents interference between pumps. In practice, it frequently introduces mixing. If the secondary circuit flow rate differs from the primary, warmer flow water blends with cooler return water inside the header. The result is elevated return temperatures back to the heat pump and a reduced effective temperature difference across the system. Higher return temperatures reduce efficiency and can impair defrost performance. The heat pump works harder, not smarter. Buffers are often justified as a way to increase system volume, prevent short cycling or accommodate zoning. There are circumstances where additional water volume is required, particularly in small radiator circuits with low thermal mass. However, most modern inverter-driven heat pumps are designed to modulate output over a wide range. If a system is correctly sized and designed for continuous operation, short cycling should not be a routine problem. Adding a buffer as a precaution frequently introduces standing heat losses, additional pumps, more controls and more commissioning variables. It also creates the potential for thermal stratification and control conflicts between the heat pump and external thermostats. In many poorly performing systems we see the same pattern: a buffer installed to compensate for undersized emitters, aggressive zoning or reliance on on-off room thermostats. The buffer masks the underlying design issue rather than resolving it. Instead of increasing emitter surface area and lowering design temperatures, the system is made more complex. Complexity in hydronic design rarely improves seasonal performance. It increases the number of failure points and makes diagnosis more difficult when things go wrong. The alternative is straightforward but requires discipline. Design emitters for low flow temperatures at design conditions. Ensure pipework and pumps can deliver the required flow rate without excessive pressure drop. Allow the heat pump’s own controls, particularly weather compensation, to regulate output continuously. Minimise zoning and avoid large numbers of motorised valves that fragment the load. Where thermostatic radiator valves are used, they should not routinely throttle down the majority of the system and force the heat pump into artificial low-load conditions. There are legitimate use cases for hydraulic separation and buffering, such as integrating multiple heat sources, managing very small secondary circuits or dealing with legacy systems that cannot be economically upgraded. But these are specific engineering decisions, not defaults. A buffer or low-loss header should be the outcome of a calculation, not a line item copied from a standard schematic. Heat pump performance is determined by fundamentals: low temperature operation, continuous modulation and adequate flow. Anything that interferes with those fundamentals should be justified with evidence. If a proposed design includes hydraulic separation, ask what problem it is solving, how it affects return temperatures and what impact it will have on seasonal efficiency. In many domestic installations, the most efficient system is also the simplest one

Page 24 / 24 Prev

Air Source Heat Pumps (ASHPs)

Last Post by CH_18 8 months ago

279 Posts

32 Users

127 Reactions

68.1 K Views

RSS

Mars

(@editor)

Illustrious Member Admin

Joined: 6 years ago

Posts: 4881

Topic starter 15/02/2026 11:22 am

@ch_18, welcome to the forums.

On the principle first: converting a 4-port buffer into a 2-pipe volumiser on the return is a logical step if your goal is to reduce mixing losses and improve emitter temperature consistency.

On your question about port orientation, in a true volumiser configuration (not decoupled) you’re not trying to achieve stratification in the same way as a buffer. So keeping both the emitter return and the heat pump return on the lower ports can be acceptable, provided the flow path through the vessel is continuous and you’re not inadvertently short-circuiting the top section.

In practice, like @judith alluded to, this is the more conventional way of plumbing in a volumiser.

On the pump question, a 7 kW Vaillant’s internal pump is generally capable of handling a typical single open circuit system provided the hydraulic resistance is reasonable. The fact that it’s currently circulating 1200 litres (I assume you mean system volume, not flow rate) is less relevant than the required flow rate and head. What's important here is whether, once you remove the secondary pump and decoupling effect of the buffer, the internal pump can achieve the required design flow at the actual system resistance. If it can't, you'll drown in flow errors.

🔥 Britain’s Heat Pump Shitshow
How Installing a Heating System Became a National Nervous Breakdown
Free UK shipping.
📗 Heat Pumps Explained
A Jargon-Free Guide for Homeowners
Rewritten and updated for 2027
📘 From Zero to Heat Pump Hero
🛠️ Bodge Buster
New to heat pumps?
Take the Heat Pump Fundamentals course and use INTRO50 at checkout for 50% off.

ReplyQuote

JamesPa

(@jamespa)

Illustrious Member Moderator

Joined: 3 years ago

Posts: 5462

15/02/2026 11:35 am

Posted by: @editor

↑

So keeping both the emitter return and the heat pump return on the lower ports can be acceptable, provided the flow path through the vessel is continuous and you’re not inadvertently short-circuiting the top section.

Without doing some horrendous modelling, or fabricating some transparent tanks, I would think that there is quite a significant risk that the upper section is effectively short circuited if both connections are at the bottom, particularly if the erstwhile buffer tank was designed to encourage stratification.

There will be some turbulence of course, and a bit of a convection current (hopefully not much if the tank is well insulated) but not a lot really to stir it up. So personally I would go in at the top and out at the bottom even if it makes the plumbing more difficult.

4kW peak of solar PV since 2011; EV and a 1930s house which has been partially renovated to improve its efficiency. 7kW Vaillant heat pump.

👍

ReplyQuote

CH_18

(@ch_18)

New Member Member

Joined: 8 months ago

Posts: 2

15/02/2026 8:07 pm

@editor Thanks for the reply. Yeah I thought in at the top, out of the bottom would be the best solution for converting to volumiser but was hoping to minimise repiping, just incase it doesn't work for example if the internal heat pump circulation pump can't cope.

If you look, I have a spare 2 ports on the left hand side of the buffer. One is about 2/3 of the way up. Would this be a better option? Or does it have to go to the top nozzle?

I have 2 circuits, both open loop. One is supplying approx 120m2 of UFH circuits and the other is supplying upstairs (2 floors) of rads? You think the pump would struggle supplying enough flow?

Thanks again

👍

ReplyQuote

Page 24 / 24 Prev

27 Forums
2,778 Topics
65.5 K Posts
2,323 Online
7,185 Members

Forum Icons: Forum contains no unread posts Forum contains unread posts

Topic Icons: Not Replied Replied Active Hot Sticky Unapproved Solved Private Closed

RE: Estimating true heat loss from twelve months of consumption data

@ian33a What size unit did you get in the end? My guess...

By scrchngwsl , 1 hour ago
RE: Replacing Storage Heaters with a Heat Pump in a Stone Cottage

Whenever I see the word modelled I am reminded of the t...

By cathodeRay , 1 hour ago
RE: Say hello and introduce yourself

@olivierm welcome to the forums and finding the right i...

By Mars , 2 hours ago
RE: Tesla Powerwall (2) Calibration Cycles

I’ve had two calibration cycles in the last three month...

By Davesoa , 23 hours ago
RE: Is This Initial Free Quote From Octopus Trusted Partner Reasonable?

@editor That's a pity, but thank you for checking. I'l...

By ltron2 , 2 days ago
RE: Heat Pump Books For Beginners: The Ultimate Guide to Heat Pumps, Bodge Buster, From Zero To Heat Pump Hero & Britain's Heat Pump Shitshow

My fifth heat pump book, Heat Pumps Explained, is out n...

By Mars , 2 days ago
RE: Who's your electricity provider and what's your tariff?

Just furkled Into the parameter menu. Found the master ...

By AgentGeorge , 2 days ago
RE: Analysis of the economics of switching to an A2W ASHP compared to other heat sources

It's interesting that Norway with a much colder climate...

By Rob of York , 2 days ago
RE: Review your electricity provider

Happy to add Scottish Power and the review 'dont touch ...

By JamesPa , 2 days ago
RE: Is it just me, or does tradesperson timekeeping and communication drive you absolutely mad?

Yes, and I would suggest likely to get worse with more ...

By Batpred , 4 days ago
RE: Electricity price predictions

This topic seems more suitable for this thread... I a...

By Batpred , 4 days ago
RE: Why are ASHP installs so expensive?

It is clearly difficult to say, there must be cases whe...

By Batpred , 4 days ago
RE: Panasonic Free Multi Z and Etherea Internal units.

@dgclimatecontrol Thank you for that information and re...

By Toodles , 4 days ago
RE: My Kronoterm Adapt 0312 ASHP is finally installed!

@editor It was serendipitous really. Both my wife and I...

By tomasmcguinness , 4 days ago

Renewable Heating Hub Heat Pump Forums

Why Buffer Tanks & Low-Loss Headers Can Sabotage Your Heat Pump's Efficiency

SPONSORS

Join Us!

Installer Finder

Degrees of Separation

Latest Posts

SPONSORS

Members Online