Joining the Renewable Heating Hub forums is completely free and only takes a minute. By registering you’ll be able to ask questions, join discussions, follow topics you’re interested in, bookmark useful threads and receive notifications when someone replies. Non-registered members also do not have access to our AI features. When choosing your username, please note that it cannot be changed later, so we recommend avoiding brand or product names. Before registering, please take a moment to read the Forum Rules & Terms of Use so we can keep the community helpful, respectful and informative for everyone. Thanks for joining!
Why Buffer Tanks & Low-Loss Headers Can Sabotage Your Heat Pump's Efficiency
@ch_18, welcome to the forums.
On the principle first: converting a 4-port buffer into a 2-pipe volumiser on the return is a logical step if your goal is to reduce mixing losses and improve emitter temperature consistency.
On your question about port orientation, in a true volumiser configuration (not decoupled) you’re not trying to achieve stratification in the same way as a buffer. So keeping both the emitter return and the heat pump return on the lower ports can be acceptable, provided the flow path through the vessel is continuous and you’re not inadvertently short-circuiting the top section.
In practice, like @judith alluded to, this is the more conventional way of plumbing in a volumiser.
On the pump question, a 7 kW Vaillant’s internal pump is generally capable of handling a typical single open circuit system provided the hydraulic resistance is reasonable. The fact that it’s currently circulating 1200 litres (I assume you mean system volume, not flow rate) is less relevant than the required flow rate and head. What's important here is whether, once you remove the secondary pump and decoupling effect of the buffer, the internal pump can achieve the required design flow at the actual system resistance. If it can't, you'll drown in flow errors.
New to heat pumps? Take the Heat Pump Fundamentals course and use INTRO50 at checkout for 50% off.
Rewritten and updated for 2027
📘 From Zero to Heat Pump Hero
🛠️ Bodge Buster
🎧 Prefer to listen? Heat Pumps Explained – use AUDIO50 at checkout for 50% off.
Posted by: @editorSo keeping both the emitter return and the heat pump return on the lower ports can be acceptable, provided the flow path through the vessel is continuous and you’re not inadvertently short-circuiting the top section.
Without doing some horrendous modelling, or fabricating some transparent tanks, I would think that there is quite a significant risk that the upper section is effectively short circuited if both connections are at the bottom, particularly if the erstwhile buffer tank was designed to encourage stratification.
There will be some turbulence of course, and a bit of a convection current (hopefully not much if the tank is well insulated) but not a lot really to stir it up. So personally I would go in at the top and out at the bottom even if it makes the plumbing more difficult.
4kW peak of solar PV since 2011; EV and a 1930s house which has been partially renovated to improve its efficiency. 7kW Vaillant heat pump.
@editor Thanks for the reply. Yeah I thought in at the top, out of the bottom would be the best solution for converting to volumiser but was hoping to minimise repiping, just incase it doesn't work for example if the internal heat pump circulation pump can't cope.
If you look, I have a spare 2 ports on the left hand side of the buffer. One is about 2/3 of the way up. Would this be a better option? Or does it have to go to the top nozzle?
I have 2 circuits, both open loop. One is supplying approx 120m2 of UFH circuits and the other is supplying upstairs (2 floors) of rads? You think the pump would struggle supplying enough flow?
Thanks again
-
Hypothetical House Design
1 month ago
-
Heat pump done right first time? Installation in Kent.
2 months ago
-
Microbore heat pump installs
3 months ago
-
Hot water tank lose heat rapidly on random days
4 months ago
-
British Gas Heat Pump Installation Complaint
9 months ago
Currently viewing this topic 15 guests.
- 27 Forums
- 2,738 Topics
- 64.3 K Posts
- 1,357 Online
- 7,143 Members
Join Us!
Installer Finder
Degrees of Separation
Latest Posts
-
RE: Has anyone seen this problem before? Huge anticycling times
Mine was replaced as they couldn’t fix and couldn’t ide...
By cg360 , 35 minutes ago
-
RE: Can I start an argument about buffer tanks please? 🙂
Dont, just adjust the LSVs to get different temperature...
By JamesPa , 3 hours ago
-
RE: Heat pump running costs – what has actually worked for you?
I installed the air source heat pump in January 2026, i...
By bobflux , 5 hours ago
-
RE: Grant Aerona Air to Water R290 6.5 kW - Quiet Mark and Silent Running
Thats all interesting. DHW on my Vailant seems to respe...
By JamesPa , 10 hours ago
-
RE: Do I need to change the control unit when replacing my Ecodan Air Source Heat Pump
One of the other mods has just reminded me that @ashp-b...
By Majordennisbloodnok , 12 hours ago
-
RE: Electricity price predictions
So a final update on Charge Pack, now I have nearly rea...
By bontwoody , 1 day ago
-
RE: Indevolt Batteries UK Support & Info Thread
My ideal install would have my battery installed before...
By BlizzardGreen , 1 day ago
-
RE: PV and battery long payback - sense check query
@old_scientist I have now drafted 2 replies - both have...
By DavidB , 2 days ago
-
RE: Air source heat pump roll call – what heat pump brand and model do you have?
Forum Handle: adrian Manufacturer: Appliandirect.co....
By Adrian , 3 days ago
-
RE: Acond heat pump failed after four years - diagnostic quote £940 plus VAT
@downfield Thank you Downfield. This sounds potenti...
By Mia , 3 days ago
-
RE: Digest of UK Energy Statistics
@jeff Yes my brother in Oz told me of that charge year...
By Jancold , 3 days ago




