Search with Wattson
Activity
 
Notifications
Clear all

Joining the Renewable Heating Hub forums is completely free and only takes a minute. By registering you’ll be able to ask questions, join discussions, follow topics you’re interested in, bookmark useful threads and receive notifications when someone replies. Non-registered members also do not have access to our AI features. When choosing your username, please note that it cannot be changed later, so we recommend avoiding brand or product names. Before registering, please take a moment to read the Forum Rules & Terms of Use so we can keep the community helpful, respectful and informative for everyone. Thanks for joining!

JamesPa
JamesPa
@jamespa
Moderator
Illustrious Member
Joined: Apr 3, 2023
Last seen: Oct 27, 2026
Topics: 28 / Replies: 5534
Reply
RE: Where heat loss surveys seem to go against practical reality

It may make sense but its not as expected, it should be negative. You are plotting delivered energy to the house vs DT and if there is a positive con...

2 months ago
Reply
RE: Next steps on my ASHP journey: Radiators and Pipework

I think trying to deduce flow rate from an instantaneous measurement of deltaT on a system where you dont know the house loss is a stretch to say the ...

2 months ago
Reply
RE: Next steps on my ASHP journey: Radiators and Pipework

That may not be the case, because its not necessarily the case that PWM = 100% means that the flow rate is 1200l/hr as depending on the pump character...

2 months ago
Reply
RE: Where heat loss surveys seem to go against practical reality

I thought so Whether you have to take them into account or not depends on the thing you are measuring/the calculation you are doing! A simple drawi...

2 months ago
Reply
RE: Next steps on my ASHP journey: Radiators and Pipework

Or where you can fix the pwm% as you can eg with Vaullant and doubtless others I'm now confused. I thought that there was no point in your syst...

2 months ago
Reply
RE: Where heat loss surveys seem to go against practical reality

@cathoderay and others. I think there may be some confusion over the contributions from external sources creeping in. They may be a variable propor...

2 months ago
Reply
RE: Where heat loss surveys seem to go against practical reality

@rob-of-york I think this a very reasonable way to approach the problem. Whilst I dont like determining things based on a single measurement point ...

2 months ago
Reply
RE: Where heat loss surveys seem to go against practical reality

@cathoderay   Good bit of analysis. Daily would suffice for consumption (as you say more frequently is needed for temperature); my main tool...

2 months ago
Reply
RE: Where heat loss surveys seem to go against practical reality

I am amazed that there is not something out there to measure depth, either by float or laser. I can buy a laser distance meter for £30, it wouldn't t...

2 months ago
Reply
RE: Next steps on my ASHP journey: Radiators and Pipework

Take a guess, do the head loss calculations at the flow rate for DT 5. If it's ok with some margin, stop worrying about head loss. If this is the c...

2 months ago
Reply
RE: Next steps on my ASHP journey: Radiators and Pipework

I would too if it were easy, but he says it isn't. In that circumstance I would probably 'suck it and see.'. Assuming the circulator head is suffic...

2 months ago
Reply
RE: Next steps on my ASHP journey: Radiators and Pipework

... which hopefully you don't have to do if there is a reasonable amount of headroom! But if there isn't then fun awaits I would be willing to b...

2 months ago
Page 18 / 465
Share:

SPONSORS

Join Us!

Installer Finder

Degrees of Separation

Latest Posts

SPONSORS

Members Online

Click to access the login or register cheese
Protected By
Shield Security PRO