Renewable Heating Hub Heat Pump Forums

Search with Wattson
Forums
Renewable Heating
Air Source Heat Pum...
Underfloor heating:...
 
Notifications
Clear all

Joining the Renewable Heating Hub forums is completely free and only takes a minute. By registering you’ll be able to ask questions, join discussions, follow topics you’re interested in, bookmark useful threads and receive notifications when someone replies. Non-registered members also do not have access to our AI features. When choosing your username, please note that it cannot be changed later, so we recommend avoiding brand or product names. Before registering, please take a moment to read the Forum Rules & Terms of Use so we can keep the community helpful, respectful and informative for everyone. Thanks for joining!

Underfloor heating: Diagrams with COP 'per water flow'

 
Air Source Heat Pumps (ASHPs)
Last Post by rhh2348 2 years ago
5 Posts
3 Users
1 Reactions
3,228 Views
RSS
 wvtienen1
(@wvtienen1)
Active Member Member
Joined: 2 years ago
Posts: 9
Topic starter 29/01/2025 5:39 pm   [#2061]

Anyone ever seen diagrams or tables that give COP per water flows; something like L/min versus COP (and of course for a certain temperature of water and Power...)

Just wondering how water flow impacts performance.



   
Quote
JamesPa
 JamesPa
(@jamespa)
Illustrious Member Moderator
Joined: 4 years ago
Posts: 5615
29/01/2025 6:47 pm  

Posted by: @wvtienen1
↑

Anyone ever seen diagrams or tables that give COP per water flows; something like L/min versus COP (and of course for a certain temperature of water and Power...)

Just wondering how water flow impacts performance.

Unless its 'out of range' I dont think it materially affects COP (directly) which is why you wont see it plotted.  The essentials of water flow are

  • there must be sufficient volume flow to carry the required heat to the emitters at a deltaT of 5C, or the figure specified in the heat pump documentation.  Your heat pump will probably complain if it isn't, unless the installer has fitted a buffer tank or bypass valve to mask the problem
  • the linear speed of water in the pipes must be sufficiently low that you dont get noise in the pipes or worse still pipe erosion ~1 m/s max in noise sensitive areas, up to perhaps 1.5m/s in less noise sensitive areas.  (In some circumstances these limits can be exceeded).  I dont know the recommended flow rates through the actual heating pipes in UFH (which is in the title) as opposed to the feed pipes.

Some heat pumps adjust water flow to achieve a constant deltaT whatever the thermal load, others don't, it doesn't matter much. 

There are a few more constraints if you are unlucky enough to have an LLH, buffer or PHE

COP varies mostly with OAT and Flow temperature.  You cant do anything about the former, you want flow temp as low as possible.

 

 

 


4kW peak of solar PV since 2011; EV and a 1930s house which has been partially renovated to improve its efficiency. 7kW Vaillant heat pump.


   
👍
1
ReplyQuote
 rhh2348
(@rhh2348)
Estimable Member Member
Joined: 3 years ago
Posts: 102
11/02/2025 2:32 pm  

I was in two minds whether to comment here or start a new post - I decided the latter as this was specifically about reference material for CoP vs flow temps, but it is probably related, given @jamespa response - see https://renewableheatinghub.co.uk/forums/renewable-heating-air-source-heap-pumps-ashps/flow-rate-vs-emitter-openness-and-cop#post-42153



   
ReplyQuote
JamesPa
 JamesPa
(@jamespa)
Illustrious Member Moderator
Joined: 4 years ago
Posts: 5615
11/02/2025 2:52 pm  

Posted by: @rhh2348
↑

I was in two minds whether to comment here or start a new post - I decided the latter as this was specifically about reference material for CoP vs flow temps, but it is probably related, given @jamespa response - see https://renewableheatinghub.co.uk/forums/renewable-heating-air-source-heap-pumps-ashps/flow-rate-vs-emitter-openness-and-cop#post-42153

I read the post you referenced and Im not wuite sure what the question you are trying to answer is.

 

If its this "In summary, if I had the choice of a lower flow rate and opening up the emitters more, or a higher flow rate and them being more closed, which should theoretically be better for efficiency / reducing flow temps / cycling?"

Im not sure you really have the free choice or what you are assuming is kept constant/varied in the two scenarios

Im assuming that you want to keep the heat output from the emitters constant, to preserve the room temperatures.

The heat output from the emitters is determined by the difference between the average emitter temperature and IAT, not directly by flow rate. 

However if you can increase the flow rate through the emitters you will reduce the deltaT across the emitters which means that the average temperature is closer to the flow temperature, which in turn means that the flow temperature can be lower (but only by a degree or so) for a given average emitter temperature.  This will be more efficient and is one of the reasons we operate heat pumps at a lower deltaT (across emitters) than boilers.

This answer is independent of the emitter type.

Does that answer the question?

 


4kW peak of solar PV since 2011; EV and a 1930s house which has been partially renovated to improve its efficiency. 7kW Vaillant heat pump.


   
ReplyQuote
 rhh2348
(@rhh2348)
Estimable Member Member
Joined: 3 years ago
Posts: 102
11/02/2025 3:09 pm  

(Answering in the referenced post)



   
ReplyQuote
Forum Jump:
  Previous Topic
Next Topic  
Share:

SPONSORS

Join Us!

Installer Finder

Degrees of Separation

Latest Posts

SPONSORS

Members Online

 No online members at the moment

Click to access the login or register cheese
Protected By
Shield Security PRO