Flow rate vs emitter 'openness', and CoP?
Struggling to get my head round this so grateful of others' thoughts:
Assuming the flow rate is fixed, and that lower flow rates (between 8 and 11L/m) still allow sufficient flow around all my emitters, am I correct in thinking a higher flow rate (14 - 17L/m) and more-closed emitters are preferable rather than the other way round?
It seems my system reports a higher CoP when I run in this way - I assume this means I can run at lower flow temps too, as the dT is smaller / the return temp is higher relative to the flow temp, and a higher flow rate allows the return temp to remain closer to the flow temp, and therefore reduces heating (and therefore power usage) and cycling.
My logical assumption would be a lower flow rate and more open UFH loops because more heat can be absorbed by the screed, but a higher flow rate for rads as it achieves higher mid-point temp, but I'm not sure why/if it's any different between emitter types nor how to determine the flow temp/rate 'tipping point', as it were.
In summary, if I had the choice of a lower flow rate and opening up the emitters more, or a higher flow rate and them being more closed, which should theoretically be better for efficiency / reducing flow temps / cycling?
In another post, @jamespa wrote:
Yes!"In summary, if I had the choice of a lower flow rate and opening up the emitters more, or a higher flow rate and them being more closed, which should theoretically be better for efficiency / reducing flow temps / cycling?"Im not sure you really have the free choice or what you are assuming is kept constant/varied in the two scenarios
Im assuming that you want to keep the heat output from the emitters constant, to preserve the room temperatures.
Well, I guess slightly-more nuianced - see below.
The lower flow temp constraint (in bold) is useful to know, and noted - thank you.The heat output from the emitters is determined by the difference between the average emitter temperature and IAT, not directly by flow rate.However if you can increase the flow rate through the emitters you will reduce the deltaT across the emitters which means that the average temperature is closer to the flow temperature, which in turn means that the flow temperature can be lower (but only by a degree or so) for a given average emitter temperature.
That makes sense as you've explained it.This will be more efficient and is one of the reasons we operate heat pumps at a lower deltaT (across emitters) than boilers.
Noted. I have read elsewhere that rads generally require a different flow rate to UFH loops (and if so, why - if they are the same diameter pipework?) - is this just in essence the same as flow-rate-to-emitter, whereby each UFH loop openness is adjusted to allow for required IAT?This answer is independent of the emitter type.
Perhaps a better way to have written it would be: "Flow rates + temps vs emitter 'openness', and CoP?" - thereby the question becomes "If the IAT can be maintained (or even raised?) by a higher flow rate, reduced flow temp (by up to 1deg C), and adjustment to emitter 'openness', which should result in the higher CoP/better system operation?"Does that answer the question?
or even: My logic says, if all UFH loops are more closed, less heated water is going round the loops and therefore the returning water is of a higher temperature and is therefore being 'wasted' / bypassing the emitters. If the dT were larger, the heater has to work harder to heat the LWT but more is being 'used'; which should be most-efficient?
Posted by: @rhh2348Noted. I have read elsewhere that rads generally require a different flow rate to UFH loops (and if so, why - if they are the same diameter pipework?) - is this just in essence the same as flow-rate-to-emitter, whereby each UFH loop openness is adjusted to allow for required IAT?
I guess that depends on where you measure it. If measured at the heat pump then the flow rate for any given heat transfer at any given deltaT (across emitters) is the same. If you measure it at the emitters then not so, because you generally have 10+ radiators and maybe 4-6 UFH loops. That said I dont know if you typically operate UFH at a lower deltaT even than radiators (it cant get much lower)!
Posted by: @rhh2348"If the IAT can be maintained (or even raised?) by a higher flow rate, reduced flow temp (by up to 1deg C), and adjustment to emitter 'openness', which should result in the higher CoP/better system operation?"
As always lower flow temperature = higher COP. However once you get down to UFH temperatures the effect gets smaller
.
Posted by: @rhh2348My logic says, if all UFH loops are more closed, less heated water is going round the loops and therefore the returning water is of a higher temperature and is therefore being 'wasted' / bypassing the emitters.
Qssuming you keep the flow temperature the same: If UFH loops are more closed the flow rate through the UFH will be less so the deltaT will be higher so the average temperature of the UFH will be lower so you emit less. The returning water is of a higher temperature but thats because the UFH emits less so the room will be colder.
Posted by: @rhh2348If the dT were larger, the heater has to work harder to heat the LWT but more is being 'used'; which should be most-efficient?
In principle the former for the reason stated
However, at low FTs the effect can be small and if its also a low loss house and mild weather than things like the consumption of the water pump become significant in comparison to the energy for actual heating. Also the effect of cycling may be important at this low output. At this point the simple thermodynamics-based arguments above break down and the engineering starts to matter. Whether anyone really cares at this level is a moot point, since the cost of heating is now very small!
4kW peak of solar PV since 2011; EV and a 1930s house which has been partially renovated to improve its efficiency. 7kW Vaillant heat pump.
- 21 Forums
- 1,985 Topics
- 43.3 K Posts
- 42 Online
- 2,311 Members
Join Us!
Heat Pump Dramas?
Thinking about installing a heat pump but unsure where to start? Already have one but it’s not performing as expected? Or are you locked in a frustrating dispute with an installer or manufacturer? We’re here to help.
✅ Pre-Installation Planning
✅ Post-Installation Troubleshooting
✅ Performance Optimisation
✅ Complaint Support (Manufacturer & Installer)
Latest Posts
-
Dont worry about this. Long story and discussion but d...
By JamesPa , 43 minutes ago
-
@eliuccio I was wondering how things are going with t...
By JamesPa , 59 minutes ago
-
RE: Database of heat pump performance data?
You could try/p> BUT i spent ages on it before real...
By Judith , 2 hours ago
-
😆 I would have been tempted to see how good the...
By Mars , 11 hours ago
-
RE: Volumisers in Heat Pump Systems: Does Placement Matter?
No not auto adapt running hotter at cheaper times coole...
By Gary , 12 hours ago
-
RE: Ecodan Auto Adapt Questions
Hi @richard24738 we weren’t happy with our FTC Contr...
By SUNandAIR , 12 hours ago
-
RE: To relocate or add extra PV panels..advice required
You can't forecast the annual generation by simple extr...
By JohnR , 13 hours ago
-
@toodles whilst I agree with toodles the actions he de...
By Potatoman , 13 hours ago
-
RE: Plug and play solar. Thoughts?
They are 'exporting to the grid' within the EREC defini...
By Transparent , 14 hours ago
-
RE: Are MCS are finally improving (some of) their guidelines?
@johnr I think OE argue that the lower running costs as...
By Toodles , 15 hours ago
-
RE: Additional Battery v Wind Turbine v Ripple
@lucia Yes, that is the response to which I referred ea...
By Toodles , 16 hours ago
-
RE: Is it worth siting panels on an East facing roof?
Yes. Thanks all. I have used the guides and have found ...
By Carpenterstation , 1 day ago
-
RE: The EPC Dilemma: How Current Ratings Fail Heat Pumps
I've commented earlier in this thread, finding the same...
By Mike Patrick , 2 days ago
-
RE: SolarPV tables / online calculator
This guy did a good analysis in summary go down a...
By Judith , 2 days ago
-
RE: ASHP Ecodan L9 error - No Heating but Hot Water
@dnagre delayed reply! It worked again for a bit but ha...
By Phoenix15 , 2 days ago
-
RE: Vaillant Arotherm Plus - new build no heating, no radiator
@john1756 did you ever get to the bottom of this?
By Mars , 2 days ago
-
RE: Aira Heat Pump: Stylish Scandinavian Heating
We tested the away mode for the first time as we were a...
By ChandyKris , 2 days ago
-
RE: Confused about Samsung Gen6 Hot Water Controller
Found a copy on this really good website 🤣 ...
By DerekDeLeon , 2 days ago
-
RE: Smart TRV experiences (ideally integrating with Midea heat pump)
@madbilly - I think you may risk over-complicating this...
By cathodeRay , 2 days ago
Latest Topics
-
Plug and play solar. Thoughts?
By Lucia 3 days ago
-
By JamesPa 3 days ago
-
Vaillant water pressure gauge vs Analogue gauge
By jeegnesh 3 days ago
-
Database of heat pump performance data?
By madbilly 3 days ago
-
By madbilly 3 days ago
-
Confused about Samsung Gen6 Hot Water Controller
By ntruby 4 days ago
-
help with new bathroom and towel radiator
By AdamK 5 days ago