Avoid the Heat Pump...
 
Notifications
Clear all

Avoid the Heat Pump Villain: Why Low-Loss Headers and Buffers Can Sabotage Your Heat Pump's Efficiency

264 Posts
30 Users
117 Reactions
19.1 K Views
Mars
 Mars
(@editor)
Illustrious Member Admin
Joined: 4 years ago
Posts: 3160
Topic starter  

In light of the recent buffer tank/warranty comments in this topic, I’ve written this piece below. It’s a 10 minute read, but I think it warrants a dedicated video/podcast, because there’s a lot of ambiguity and grey areas here that need clarification.

https://renewableheatinghub.co.uk/fact-or-fiction-are-buffer-tanks-really-necessary-to-protect-your-heat-pump-warranty/

Buy Bodge Buster – Homeowner Air Source Heat Pump Installation Guide: https://amzn.to/3NVndlU
From Zero to Heat Pump Hero: https://amzn.to/4bWkPFb

Subscribe and follow our Homeowners’ Q&A heat pump podcast


   
ReplyQuote
(@heatgeek)
Estimable Member Member
Joined: 5 months ago
Posts: 110
 

@potatoman As no one seems to be obliging, I attach a diagram. The idea is that only bypass flow goes through the tank when necessary so it is undisturbed by main flow. Connection to tank must be closely coupled.

 

3 Port Buffer Tank

Private individual. No affiliation with commercial "Heat Geeks" of same coincidental name.


   
ReplyQuote
(@ashp-bobba)
Reputable Member Member
Joined: 5 months ago
Posts: 116
 

@heatgeek is it that this design satisfies the manufacturers? its still (although balance by bypass) a double hydronic volumiser/buffer with 2 pumps


   
ReplyQuote



(@heatgeek)
Estimable Member Member
Joined: 5 months ago
Posts: 110
 

@ashp-bobba  I am afraid that you are talking to the wrong person about manufacturers preferences. However, as far as I can see, it functions the same as a 4 port buffer except that flow doesn't go through the top of the tank causing mixing, therefore I would have thought that it is a perfectly acceptable alternative to a 4-port.

Private individual. No affiliation with commercial "Heat Geeks" of same coincidental name.


   
ReplyQuote
(@ashp-bobba)
Reputable Member Member
Joined: 5 months ago
Posts: 116
 

@heatgeek Oh agreed, its a slightly better and slightly less resistive solution, perhaps even the middle ground of no buffer V buffer.


   
ReplyQuote
(@potatoman)
Estimable Member Member
Joined: 1 year ago
Posts: 57
 

@heatgeek Thank-you for your reply, can you clarify the circulating pump situation, would you have to have 3 circulating pumps in operation, one in the heat pump and two in the design. Thanks

 


   
ReplyQuote
(@ashp-bobba)
Reputable Member Member
Joined: 5 months ago
Posts: 116
 

@potatoman hi, the scheme detailed is 2 pumps, one for the ASHP (primary) and 1 for the secondary circuits.

 

 


   
ReplyQuote
(@heatgeek)
Estimable Member Member
Joined: 5 months ago
Posts: 110
 

@potatoman  No, the installation is exactly the same as a 4 port buffer with primary and secondary pumps except that the output flow bypasses the top of tank so as not to disturb the stratification of the tank. This removes some of the inefficiency problems associated with 4 port buffer tanks, like output temperature being reduced by mixing.

Private individual. No affiliation with commercial "Heat Geeks" of same coincidental name.


   
ReplyQuote
(@heatgeek)
Estimable Member Member
Joined: 5 months ago
Posts: 110
 

Note a key point here though. The primary pump is connected in the return pipe while the secondary pump is connected in the flow pipe after the buffer tank to provide good hydronic separation between the primary and secondary pumps.

Private individual. No affiliation with commercial "Heat Geeks" of same coincidental name.


   
ReplyQuote



(@heatgeek)
Estimable Member Member
Joined: 5 months ago
Posts: 110
 

Only the difference in flow between the heat pump and the emitters passes through the tank. This lower flow helps to preserve the stratification of the tank so that dilution of temperature to the emitters is minimised.

Private individual. No affiliation with commercial "Heat Geeks" of same coincidental name.


   
ReplyQuote
(@heatgeek)
Estimable Member Member
Joined: 5 months ago
Posts: 110
 

Apologies. Poor choice of words. Delete "dilution of temperature to emitters is minimised".

Private individual. No affiliation with commercial "Heat Geeks" of same coincidental name.


   
ReplyQuote
(@jamespa)
Illustrious Member Moderator
Joined: 2 years ago
Posts: 2389
 

Posted by: @heatgeek

Note a key point here though. The primary pump is connected in the return pipe while the secondary pump is connected in the flow pipe after the buffer tank to provide good hydronic separation between the primary and secondary pumps.

That all sounds very believable.  Presumably mixing of return water with flow water to the emitters (and thus a reduction of ft to emitters) will however still occur if the primary pump throughput is less than the secondary, so the requirement to set up properly remains albeit that it is less sensitive than a 4 port.

 

This post was modified 6 hours ago by JamesPa

4kW peak of solar PV since 2011; EV and a 1930s house which has been partially renovated to improve its efficiency. 7kW Vaillant heat pump.


   
ReplyQuote
Page 22 / 22
Share:

Join Us!

Trusted Installers

Struggling to find a reliable heat pump installer? A poor installation can lead to inefficiencies and high running costs. We now connect homeowners with top-rated installers who deliver quality work and excellent service.

✅ Verified, trusted & experienced installers
✅ Nationwide coverage expanding
✅ Special offers available

👉 Find your installer now!

Latest Posts

x  Powerful Protection for WordPress, from Shield Security
This Site Is Protected By
Shield Security