Search with Wattson

Notifications

Clear all

Joining the Renewable Heating Hub forums is completely free and only takes a minute. By registering you’ll be able to ask questions, join discussions, follow topics you’re interested in, bookmark useful threads and receive notifications when someone replies. Non-registered members also do not have access to our AI features. When choosing your username, please note that it cannot be changed later, so we recommend avoiding brand or product names. Before registering, please take a moment to read the Forum Rules & Terms of Use so we can keep the community helpful, respectful and informative for everyone. Thanks for joining!

Why One Strike on Iran’s Oil Infrastructure Undermines Every Heat Pump and Solar Array in Britain

Mars · 2026-03-08T20:59:02Z

The images from Tehran continue to dominate the screens: vast plumes of black smoke rising from the Shahran oil depot and other fuel storage sites in the Iranian capital, ignited by strikes carried out jointly by American and Israeli forces as the conflict enters its second week. Credible reporting from outlets including Sky News, BBC, CNN, France 24, The New York Times, AP and Reuters confirms that these attacks, which began targeting energy infrastructure in earnest over the weekend of 7-8 March 2026, have set alight depots holding millions of litres of refined products. The fires are not brief flares. They burn with the intensity that turns night into an orange haze, releasing hydrocarbons directly into the atmosphere in quantities that dwarf everyday calculations of domestic emissions. A single large oil storage tank, when breached and ignited, can release tens of thousands of tonnes of petroleum products into combustion within hours. The combustion is unforgiving. Each tonne of fuel burned produces approximately 3.1 tonnes of CO2. Eyewitness footage and satellite observations suggest multiple tanks at Shahran and nearby facilities were compromised, with fires spreading across infrastructure linked to the Revolutionary Guard. Conservative estimates, drawing on the known capacities of these depots (often in the range of hundreds of millions of litres) and the visible scale of the blazes, place the immediate CO2 release from one night's strikes in the order of 50,000 to 200,000 tonnes or more. A thick plume of smoke rises from an oil storage facility hit by a US-Israeli strike late Saturday in Tehran, Iran, Sunday, March 8, 2026. (AP Photo/Vahid Salemi) This figure excludes additional emissions from associated refining complexes damaged in the campaign, as well as the black carbon and other short-lived climate forcers carried aloft by the smoke. The military operations themselves compound the damage. The United States has deployed carrier-based aviation from the Abraham Lincoln strike group in the Arabian Sea, launching waves of F/A-18 Super Hornets and F-35 Lightning IIs. Israeli squadrons of F-35 Adirs and F-15s have conducted long-range strikes, supported by aerial refuelling tankers. Each fighter sortie consumes between 5,000 and 15,000 litres of jet fuel, each B-2 or refuelling mission several times that. Aviation kerosene emits approximately 2.53 kg of CO₂ per litre when burned. A single Super Hornet combat sortie therefore generates 15-40 tonnes of CO2... a B-2 mission more than 60 tonnes. With hundreds of sorties flown since 28 February, when the joint operation began, the cumulative fuel burn from aircraft alone already exceeds 35,000 tonnes of CO2 in the conflict’s first week, according to preliminary assessments modelled on similar campaigns. Tomahawk cruise missiles launched from US warships add further emissions, as do the logistics flights ferrying munitions and personnel across the region. The Pentagon’s own historical data show that modern warfare is among the most carbon-intensive activities on earth. In fact, the US military alone accounts for a larger annual emissions footprint than many entire nations. When these direct releases from targeted infrastructure and operational fuel burn are combined, the carbon cost of even a limited phase of the campaign becomes staggering. A single concentrated assault on Tehran's fuel depots, coupled with the sorties required to execute it, can equate to 100,000-300,000 tonnes of CO2 released in days. In the United Kingdom, the switch from a conventional gas boiler to an air source heat pump typically saves between 1,400-1,900 kg of CO2 per household annually, according to figures from British Gas, Energy Saving Trust and other analyses. Pairing the heat pump with a domestic solar array pushes that saving comfortably above two tonnes per year for many homes. The arithmetic is merciless. The emissions from one strike in Iran offset the annual decarbonisation gains of 50,000 to 150,000 British households. Extend this across the full scope of the ongoing campaign (with its repeated waves, retaliatory exchanges and broadening regional disruptions) and the equivalent quickly reaches hundreds of thousands, potentially millions, of household-years of effort erased. This disparity raises a question that cannot be evaded by those of us who have invested time, money and conviction in home-level decarbonisation. Is it worth it? When geopolitical decisions taken far beyond our borders unleash carbon pulses of this magnitude, when a handful of precision-guided munitions can incinerate the equivalent emissions savings of entire cities' worth of retrofitted homes, what rational basis remains for the individual householder to persist? The British government urges millions of installations by the end of the decade, backed by grants and mandates, yet the global carbon ledger appears to be balanced not in planning documents or domestic energy bills, but in the targeting c...

Page 5 / 5 Prev

Well & Truly Off The Grid

Last Post by Old_Scientist 7 months ago

49 Posts

13 Users

54 Reactions

7,960 Views

RSS

Old_Scientist

(@old_scientist)

Prominent Member Member

Joined: 2 years ago

Posts: 575

30/03/2026 4:11 pm

Posted by: @editor

↑

I have to admit, the longer this Iranian saga drags on, the more I struggle with it. As I grow older, these situations irk me more and more. My patience for arrogance, ignorance, flexing, bullying, gold-plated White House ballrooms and the casual disregard for the human cost of big decisions is getting noticeably shorter. It genuinely gives me anxiety.

What astounds me most (and I know it shouldn't) is that the decisions and actions of one man can inflict this much damage on billions of people around the world.

What hits me hardest is how heavily this penalises the very people who have been trying to do the right thing. Tens of thousands of us here in the UK have spent our own hard-earned money on solar arrays, heat pumps, batteries and insulation precisely to reduce our reliance on volatile fossil fuels and protect ourselves from exactly these kinds of global shocks. Now those careful, responsible steps are being undermined in real time. Even with renewables on the roof, the knock-on effects (higher wholesale electricity prices, inflated grid charges and the wider cost-of-living squeeze) mean the financial payback stretches out and the sense of security we thought we’d built evaporates. It feels profoundly unfair that those trying to act responsibly are being penalised so heavily by events far beyond their control. I've spent the weekend (again) thinking how we can limit the impact on our household and our finances.

I feel your frustration and anger.

I try to lessen those feelings of anxiety by looking at how much we would now be paying for oil had we not ripped out the oil boiler and replaced it with an ASHP. Our bills are low instead of currently being sky high, and we are as well placed as we can possibly be to remain being resilient to future shocks. I realise everyone is not as fortunate as ourselves and that is immediately apparent talking to my neighbours who are still dependant on heating oil and their petrol & diesel cars.

Samsung 12kW gen6 ASHP with 50L volumiser and large radiators. 7.2kWp solar (south facing), Tesla PW3 (13.5kW). Net Zero

👍

ReplyQuote

Page 5 / 5 Prev