Notifications

Clear all

Joining the Renewable Heating Hub forums is completely free and only takes a minute. By registering you’ll be able to ask questions, join discussions, follow topics you’re interested in, bookmark useful threads and receive notifications when someone replies. When choosing your username, please note that it cannot be changed later, so we recommend avoiding brand or product names. Before registering, please take a moment to read the Forum Rules & Terms of Use so we can keep the community helpful, respectful and informative for everyone. Thanks for joining!

Why One Strike on Iran’s Oil Infrastructure Undermines Every Heat Pump and Solar Array in Britain

Mars · 2026-03-08T20:59:02Z

The images from Tehran continue to dominate the screens: vast plumes of black smoke rising from the Shahran oil depot and other fuel storage sites in the Iranian capital, ignited by strikes carried out jointly by American and Israeli forces as the conflict enters its second week. Credible reporting from outlets including Sky News, BBC, CNN, France 24, The New York Times, AP and Reuters confirms that these attacks, which began targeting energy infrastructure in earnest over the weekend of 7-8 March 2026, have set alight depots holding millions of litres of refined products. The fires are not brief flares. They burn with the intensity that turns night into an orange haze, releasing hydrocarbons directly into the atmosphere in quantities that dwarf everyday calculations of domestic emissions. A single large oil storage tank, when breached and ignited, can release tens of thousands of tonnes of petroleum products into combustion within hours. The combustion is unforgiving. Each tonne of fuel burned produces approximately 3.1 tonnes of CO2. Eyewitness footage and satellite observations suggest multiple tanks at Shahran and nearby facilities were compromised, with fires spreading across infrastructure linked to the Revolutionary Guard. Conservative estimates, drawing on the known capacities of these depots (often in the range of hundreds of millions of litres) and the visible scale of the blazes, place the immediate CO2 release from one night's strikes in the order of 50,000 to 200,000 tonnes or more. A thick plume of smoke rises from an oil storage facility hit by a US-Israeli strike late Saturday in Tehran, Iran, Sunday, March 8, 2026. (AP Photo/Vahid Salemi) This figure excludes additional emissions from associated refining complexes damaged in the campaign, as well as the black carbon and other short-lived climate forcers carried aloft by the smoke. The military operations themselves compound the damage. The United States has deployed carrier-based aviation from the Abraham Lincoln strike group in the Arabian Sea, launching waves of F/A-18 Super Hornets and F-35 Lightning IIs. Israeli squadrons of F-35 Adirs and F-15s have conducted long-range strikes, supported by aerial refuelling tankers. Each fighter sortie consumes between 5,000 and 15,000 litres of jet fuel, each B-2 or refuelling mission several times that. Aviation kerosene emits approximately 2.53 kg of CO₂ per litre when burned. A single Super Hornet combat sortie therefore generates 15-40 tonnes of CO2... a B-2 mission more than 60 tonnes. With hundreds of sorties flown since 28 February, when the joint operation began, the cumulative fuel burn from aircraft alone already exceeds 35,000 tonnes of CO2 in the conflict’s first week, according to preliminary assessments modelled on similar campaigns. Tomahawk cruise missiles launched from US warships add further emissions, as do the logistics flights ferrying munitions and personnel across the region. The Pentagon’s own historical data show that modern warfare is among the most carbon-intensive activities on earth. In fact, the US military alone accounts for a larger annual emissions footprint than many entire nations. When these direct releases from targeted infrastructure and operational fuel burn are combined, the carbon cost of even a limited phase of the campaign becomes staggering. A single concentrated assault on Tehran's fuel depots, coupled with the sorties required to execute it, can equate to 100,000-300,000 tonnes of CO2 released in days. In the United Kingdom, the switch from a conventional gas boiler to an air source heat pump typically saves between 1,400-1,900 kg of CO2 per household annually, according to figures from British Gas, Energy Saving Trust and other analyses. Pairing the heat pump with a domestic solar array pushes that saving comfortably above two tonnes per year for many homes. The arithmetic is merciless. The emissions from one strike in Iran offset the annual decarbonisation gains of 50,000 to 150,000 British households. Extend this across the full scope of the ongoing campaign (with its repeated waves, retaliatory exchanges and broadening regional disruptions) and the equivalent quickly reaches hundreds of thousands, potentially millions, of household-years of effort erased. This disparity raises a question that cannot be evaded by those of us who have invested time, money and conviction in home-level decarbonisation. Is it worth it? When geopolitical decisions taken far beyond our borders unleash carbon pulses of this magnitude, when a handful of precision-guided munitions can incinerate the equivalent emissions savings of entire cities' worth of retrofitted homes, what rational basis remains for the individual householder to persist? The British government urges millions of installations by the end of the decade, backed by grants and mandates, yet the global carbon ledger appears to be balanced not in planning documents or domestic energy bills, but in the targeting c...

Page 3 / 3 Prev

Well & Truly Off The Grid

Last Post by TechnoGeek 7 hours ago

25 Posts

10 Users

25 Reactions

236 Views

RSS

TechnoGeek

(@technogeek)

Estimable Member Member

Joined: 3 years ago

Posts: 169

12/03/2026 3:44 pm

@Mars at the time of writing heating oil is £1.28 / ltr in our area. One positive item to come out of all this is my Wife, who was very sceptical of all this renewable technology, is not so sceptical anymore. She is now glad I ignored her and went ahead with everything! 😀

This post was modified 7 hours ago by TechnoGeek

5 Bedroom House in Cambridgeshire, double glazing, 300mm loft insulation and cavity wall insulation
Design temperature 21C @ OAT -2C = 10.2Kw heat loss, deltaT = 8 degrees
Bivalent system containing:
12Kw Samsung High Temperature Quiet (Gen 6) heat pump
26Kw Grant Blue Flame Oil Boiler
4.1Kw Solar Panel Array
34Kwh GivEnergy Stackable Battery System

👍

ReplyQuote

Page 3 / 3 Prev