Search with Wattson

Notifications

Clear all

Joining the Renewable Heating Hub forums is completely free and only takes a minute. By registering you’ll be able to ask questions, join discussions, follow topics you’re interested in, bookmark useful threads and receive notifications when someone replies. Non-registered members also do not have access to our AI features. When choosing your username, please note that it cannot be changed later, so we recommend avoiding brand or product names. Before registering, please take a moment to read the Forum Rules & Terms of Use so we can keep the community helpful, respectful and informative for everyone. Thanks for joining!

Should Households Who Can Afford It Pay More for Energy to Help Those Who Can't?

Mars · 2026-11-09T14:50:03Z

I had a quick look through the government's new Energy Independence Bill, which was introduced to Parliament last week, and there's something tucked away in it that I think is worth discussing, particularly given how much time we spend on these forums talking about energy bills, heating costs and the wider transition away from fossil fuels. One of the provisions, Clause 108, would give ministers more flexibility over how financial support is provided to households struggling with their energy bills, which sounds perfectly reasonable, but the interesting part is that it would also allow the costs of those schemes to be shared differently between different groups of energy customers. In other words, it opens the door to a situation where some households could end up contributing more than others towards helping people who simply cannot afford to heat their homes. Now, before anyone gets too excited, the government hasn't announced that wealthier households are going to pay more for their energy, and there's no confirmed proposal to charge people more simply because they use more electricity. What the legislation does is create the powers that could make different arrangements possible in future, and the government's own explanation of the bill makes it clear that the intention is to provide more flexibility in how support is targeted and funded. But it does raise a rather interesting question about fairness, because I don't imagine many of us would disagree with helping people who genuinely cannot afford to heat their homes, particularly pensioners, vulnerable households and families already struggling to make ends meet. The difficulty, of course, is that somebody has to pay for that support, and whether the money comes from general taxation, additional charges on energy bills or some combination of the two, the costs don't simply disappear. We're already doing something similar through the Warm Home Discount, which provides eligible households with £150 towards their energy bills, with the scheme ultimately funded through charges recovered from energy customers. Interestingly, the government has also announced plans to move a substantial proportion of the Renewables Obligation costs away from household electricity bills and onto public spending, which makes this all the more interesting because we're potentially looking at some energy related costs being taken off bills while others could be distributed differently between customers. And here's where I think it starts getting a little messy. How exactly do we decide who can afford to pay more? Someone might have a decent salary but also a large mortgage, children and all sorts of other financial commitments, while a retired couple living in a fairly valuable house might have very little disposable income. Equally, somebody using a lot of energy isn't necessarily wealthy or wasteful, particularly if they live in an older, poorly insulated property that simply takes a lot of energy to keep warm. There's also a potentially awkward contradiction when it comes to electrification, because we're spending an enormous amount of time and money encouraging households to move away from gas and oil towards heat pumps, electric vehicles and other electrical technologies, all of which can increase household electricity consumption even while reducing fossil fuel use. If we eventually introduced a system that charged more to households consuming greater quantities of electricity, without properly accounting for why they're using it, we could end up making the very transition we're trying to encourage more expensive. That would be a fairly spectacular own goal IMO. I also wonder whether we spend too much time discussing ways of helping people pay their energy bills and not enough time addressing why some homes are so expensive to heat in the first place. Obviously, if somebody can't afford to put the heating on tonight, telling them that better insulation might save them money over the next twenty years isn't particularly helpful, so there will always be a need for immediate financial support. But surely the longer-term ambition should be to make homes more affordable to heat in the first place, rather than creating an ever-growing system of subsidies to help people cope with buildings that are fundamentally inefficient. I can see both sides of the argument. On the one hand, energy is an essential service and there's a perfectly reasonable case for saying that people with greater financial means should contribute more towards ensuring that nobody is left in a cold home. On the other, I do wonder whether energy bills are really the right place to redistribute income, particularly when consumption doesn't necessarily reflect someone's ability to pay and when we already have a taxation system designed, at least in principle, to take account of people's financial circumstances. So I'm curious what everyone thinks. Should households that can comfortably afford to pay more be expe...

Page 2 / 2 Prev

Government Schemes, Regulations, Training, Planning & Organisations

Last Post by Rob of York 25 minutes ago

14 Posts

6 Users

9 Reactions

96 Views

RSS

Toodles

(@toodles)

Famed Member Contributor

Joined: 4 years ago

Posts: 3060

10/11/2026 4:13 pm

@jamespa The complexity ensures employment for all those accountants!

Toodles, heats his home with cold draughts and cooks food with magnets.

ReplyQuote

Rob of York

(@rob-of-york)

Reputable Member Member

Joined: 3 months ago

Posts: 166

10/11/2026 4:59 pm

Posted by: @jamespa

My personal view is that we have too many taxes and too much complexity

Completely agree with that!

That said I have no idea how the complexity of our tax/benefits/subsidies system compares with that of other countries

Apparently we have about 90 different taxes compared to over 300 in France and less than 60 in Germany - there's an excellent analysis of it here:

https://taxpolicy.org.uk/2026/05/30/france-germany-uk-number-of-taxes-charts/

ReplyQuote

Page 2 / 2 Prev

Forum Jump:

Previous Topic

Currently viewing this topic 1 guest.

Recently viewed by users: Rob of York 23 minutes ago, Majordennisbloodnok 1 hour ago, Toodles 58 minutes ago, JamesPa 1 hour ago.

27 Forums
2,813 Topics
66.6 K Posts
5,436 Online
7,223 Members

Forum Icons: Forum contains no unread posts Forum contains unread posts

Topic Icons: Not Replied Replied Active Hot Sticky Unapproved Solved Private Closed

RE: Why don't people choose heat pumps?

@rob-of-york The Panasonic units also have a microscopi...

By Toodles , 1 minute ago
RE: Should Households Who Can Afford It Pay More for Energy to Help Those Who Can't?

Posted by: @jamespa My personal view is that we have...

By Rob of York , 25 minutes ago
RE: Adventures in heat loss calculations

@toodles thanks! So as suspected, around a doubling of ...

By SusannaSaunders , 36 minutes ago
RE: Books about heat pumps

Six books in three years and I think I’ve now covered j...

By Mars , 1 hour ago
RE: Grant Aerona3 13kw - Buffer Tank - Heating Journey

@heymikey Well done in achieving as nearer a match acro...

By Toodles , 7 hours ago
RE: DIY powerflushing tutorial

I didn't throw it away. Is there a way to determine wha...

By bobflux , 9 hours ago
Grant Aerona - Weather Compensation and Schedules

Im trying to set up a friends Grant Aerona. The WC curv...

By bontwoody , 1 day ago
RE: Air-to-Air Heat Pumps & Air Conditioning: UK Heating and Cooling Q&A

@jamespa I agree, the efficiency of Cosy Cooler ought...

By Rob of York , 1 day ago
RE: How much of your renewable and home setup would still work if the internet went down?

I think you're right! 🤨

By Transparent , 2 days ago
RE: Renewables & Heat Pumps in the News

ECO4 muddies the water somewhat, and then some. I thi...

By cathodeRay , 2 days ago
RE: Vaillant ecoTEC Plus - Flow Temp and Set Up

If there is a drain nearby that's exactly what I would ...

By JamesPa , 2 days ago
RE: Hydrogen Ready

I think that CCGT plant in Lingen is more likely to suc...

By Transparent , 3 days ago
RE: Heat Geek installations: share your experiences

@l8again fwiw my experience (Valiant but not with heat ...

By JamesPa , 3 days ago
RE: How Can I Prove Coal Was My Main Heating Source Without Receipts?

@etchedpixels thank you for the advice paid cash all...

By Chilli304 , 4 days ago
RE: The Changing Jet Stream Could Challenge UK Air Source Heat Pumps

@susannasaunders An interesting conversation to have ...

By Rob of York , 5 days ago

Renewable Heating Hub Heat Pump Forums

Should Households Who Can Afford It Pay More for Energy to Help Those Who Can't?

SPONSORS

Join Us!

Installer Finder

Degrees of Separation

Latest Posts

SPONSORS

Members Online