Forums

Forums
Renewable Heating
Air Source Heat Pum...
ASHP Heat Loss Calc...
 
Notifications
Clear all

ASHP Heat Loss Calculations with Log Burner

 
Air Source Heat Pumps (ASHPs)
Last Post by AndyOrchard2 8 months ago
3 Posts
2 Users
2 Likes
727 Views
RSS
 AndyOrchard2
(@andyorchard2)
Active Member Member
37 kWhs
Joined: 8 months ago
Posts: 2
Topic starter 08/09/2023 8:00 am  

Hi Folks

I've been an avid follower for a while and found some really useful info so thanks to all contributors.

We've had a heat loss survey conducted, and it has got a huge (2000W) requirement for the small lounge which has a wood burning stove installed.

The surveyor said it was due to it being classed as an 'open flue' which it technically is when the burner is lit (and kicking out heat 🤔), but the rest of the time the air vent is shut which I thought would be similar to an air brick in the wall (i.e. not taken into consideration). 

Removing the wood burner from the calcs cuts the power requirement in half which is much more achievable with either simple UFH or rad. 

The wood burner is a nice feature and we won't be relying on it for heat, but it seems a very expensive luxury!

Has anyone come across this before? Should we just remove the log burner (at least from the calcs!) or is the open flue calculation correct? 


   
Quote
Topic Tags
ASHP Woodburner Heat Loss
 AllyFish
(@allyfish)
Noble Member Contributor
3081 kWhs
Joined: 2 years ago
Posts: 377
12/09/2023 4:10 pm  

Hi @AndyOrchard2, I would definitely challenge your surveyor on that one. Chances are whatever software they are using only has an open flue/open fire option. A log burner with stove plate draws very little combustion air, hence why units of less than 5 or 6kW (I forget which) don't require fixed ventilation inlet openings. Compared to stoves, open fires draw much more air up a chimney, several times more, due to the induction effect of warm air rising from the fire drawing in colder room air. That's why log burners are so much better space heaters, they are more efficient at combustion, and also much less cold air is drawn into the room the stove is in from cooler areas, because they only ingest air required for combustion with almost no induction of air.

We have an ASHP + 5kW log burner in the sitting room, the log burner was not factored into our heat loss estimate, as it's room sealed (or as good as) when not lit and the vents closed. Our sitting room came out at 1.5kW heat loss, but has two large glazed windows + two external walls. We changed two existing 1992 double panel rads for longer, lower, and higher capacity Stelrad K2s. They do the job nicely without the log burner on with CH flow temperature set to a maximum of 45degC.

One of the concerns of oversizing ASHPs is minimum turn down capacity. An ASHP will spend the vast majority of time in operation below maximum nameplate kW rating on part load. ASHPs modulate down to about 25%. Too large a unit with a minimum output higher than the house heating demand will then cycle on and off as the only way it can reduce output below minimum turn down. This isn't that efficient as the compressor is not chugging quietly away under inverter control, it is switching on and off, and each time it starts it's playing catch up and working a little harder, due to pre-programmed on-off cycle times that limit the number of compressor starts per hour.

If you have a log burner you have cost-effective secondary source of heating, which can be used to boost temperature quickly if need be, or to supplement your ASHP during particularly cold spells. Remind your installer of that and ensure they 'right size, but don't oversize' 


   
Mars reacted
ReplyQuote
 AndyOrchard2
(@andyorchard2)
Active Member Member
37 kWhs
Joined: 8 months ago
Posts: 2
Topic starter 13/09/2023 9:10 pm  

Thank you @allyfish for the really useful reply.  

It does seem a case of 'computer says no' which could be an MCS thing as the calcs work fine without the flue.

The driver appears to be the air changes as the calculator assumes 5 air changes an hour when including an ‘open flue’ compared to 1.5ac/hr without.

Your insight is great proof that an effective ASHP set up can be achieved with a log burner in situ given the ability to close vents etc., so hopefully some pragmatism can be applied to the model – although I’m not holding my breath…

Overall, it increases the space heating demand for the entire house by 27% (from 3.65kw to 4.76kw) so pretty fundamental to the overall design, but maybe not a show stopper based on your comment re ASHPs being able to modulate down c.25% which would be about right for real world comfort!

The original design was set at 50C flow temp too (as a result of this fandango around the flue) so your caution of oversizing is even more of a reason to tweak the model.

Your response was exactly what I was hoping to read so thanks again – much appreciated.


   
AllyFish reacted
ReplyQuote



Forum Jump:
  Previous Topic
Next Topic  
Related Topics
Topic Tags:  ASHP (53) , Woodburner (1) , Heat Loss (1) ,



Share:

Join Us!

Latest Posts

x Powerful Protection for WordPress, from Shield Security
This Site Is Protected By
Shield Security →