Raising product standards for space heating
An interesting post from the government today:
Today we’ve published our consultation on raising product standards for space heating products. This includes increasing minimum performance standards for heat pumps and boilers entering the UK market, banning class I-III temperature controls and also re-banding energy labels so gas boilers are on the same scale as heat pumps but cannot be more than F-rated. You can read the consultation and how to respond here:
Pre-order: The Ultimate Guide to Heat Pumps
Subscribe and follow our Homeowners’ Q&A heat pump podcast
A big 'hmmm' from me. 😉
The elephant in the sitting room is not the efficiency and rated performance of heat pumps when tested to BS EN 14511 or BS EN 14825 in a laboratory. Nearly all current and popular make and model ASHPs will comfortably pass the Government's minimum performance requirements now and the future requirements they are consulting on....
These proposals do not consider system effect. Testing an ASHP in a climate controlled laboratory with perfectly stable [artificial] control conditions will always give favourable results - there's no losses, inefficiencies or constraints. Put the same ASHP into a real-world retrofit in someone's house and it's not going to perform as well. It's not going to meet the performance declared under BS EN 14511 which MCS cut and paste in their database. It's the real-world performance that matters to the home-owner, because that's directly related to what it will cost them to run.
Currently, to my knowledge, only Heat Geek Installers are prepared to put their money where their mouth is and warrant a minimum installed SCOP inclusive of system effect.
In theory, if you drive up the efficiency of the heat source, then regardless of system effect, there should be some tangible improvement at the emitters and benefit to the homeowner, but that's not guaranteed - especially when the installation quality is pants with all sorts of complicated zone controllers, unsuitable thermostats, poor pipework insulation, buffers and circulating pumps a-plenty.
My initial thoughts, having just skimmed through the first of the four documents:
1: The anticipated cost savings for consumers are pretty low:
Those gains can be very easily wiped out by increased prices for items which are designed and tested to meet the proposed new standards...
... or by incorrect installation.
2: There are some statements which may not reflect 'good science':
Is this correct?
a: Why is the amount of water in the coil significant, whereas there's no suggestion of a Regulation to define the surface area?
My cylinder's coils are vaned, creating a massive surface area.
b: Is it really the case that a DHW cylinder might have almost as much water in the coil as it does in the body of the tank?
Can an installer please comment?!
3: As we're not an official organisation, I think any submission from forum members should read much as the response from @allyfish above.
We need to be telling them how it really is, in plain English.
4: Unlike the submissions from corporates and advisory bodies, we should be including photos, graphs, diagrams etc.
Most respondees to such consultations will send in a 'report' using black text on a white background.
We can do better than that!
5: The Questions embedded in the documents seem to be leading readers down a defined path.
My past experience of this practice is that the later questions tend to only make sense if the respondent has 'agreed' with the DESNZ thinking in the early questions.
I tend to pick that up and respond accordingly, such as
This question is biased. It assumes that the responses to questions 13-18 were in favour of achieving greater efficiency by defining standards for component parts of a heating system.
However, the greatest loss of efficiency is due to poor system design and shoddy installation.
Those significant losses can't be addressed by using components with higher specifications.
(NB the above is just an example. I haven't actually checked Questions 13-18 !)
6: We don't have to answer all questions.
Nor do we have to send in the whole lot in one go.
7: The consultation has an email address : spaceheatingstandards@energysecurity.gov.uk
Any of us can therefore send in additional relevant material which DESNZ hasn't consulted on.
Just because the authors have omitted something, shouldn't prevent any of us from writing in to say to so and then explain it !
If you feel suitably stirred up, you can send in a complete alternative strategy which would better achieve the cost savings and/or better reflect Government policy to attain Net Zero.
For example, I don't see why this Consultation should commence with para.2 in the Exec Summary proposing changes to regulations for boilers which won't come into force until 2028.
So just how does that comply with Net Zero strategy?! 🤔
Save energy... recycle electrons!
- 26 Forums
- 2,129 Topics
- 46.7 K Posts
- 29 Online
- 5,651 Members
Podcast Picks
Latest Posts
-
RE: Octopus Cosy & Octopus EV + bidirectional smart tariff, together. What, eh?
@old_scientist me too. Just installed my new heat pump ...
By Eliuccio , 15 hours ago
-
RE: Is your heat pump insured?
Yup just spoke to Privilege to inform them of my impend...
By Scalextrix , 16 hours ago
-
Well by my reckoning based on the Flexible Octopus unit...
By Majordennisbloodnok , 17 hours ago
-
RE: Who's your electricity provider and what's your tariff?
@old_scientist I have had the first PW for some 2 years...
By Toodles , 17 hours ago
-
RE: Forum updates, announcements & issues
Just to keep everyone in the loop, as the site continue...
By Mars , 1 day ago
-
RE: Fast DHW setting on Midea (Clivet) heat pump
@simon-w, is this something you could potentially assis...
By Mars , 2 days ago
-
RE: Share Your Experiences with Heat Pump Manufacturer Support
Fwiw I called my installer out for the first time a few...
By JamesPa , 2 days ago
-
RE: New Vaillant aroTherm Plus in black - When will it come to the UK?
@sandy, I'll send Vaillant an email tomorrow and see if...
By Mars , 2 days ago
-
RE: Long term efficiency degradation
@jamespa yes as I thought thanks. We have a reaso...
By Scalextrix , 2 days ago
-
RE: Who has a V2G EV installation
I agree, but a word of caution. V2X is also sometimes u...
By Majordennisbloodnok , 3 days ago
-
RE: Sunamp Thermino Heat Battery
@jamespa A few days after the installation had been com...
By Toodles , 3 days ago
-
RE: Planning Permission May 2025
Fair enough. I have read the legislation and MCS020a ...
By JamesPa , 5 days ago
-
RE: How do I choose a single room MVHR to prevent losing heat in my bathroom ?
An update on the Heatsava. It is the most difficult thi...
By heat-pump-newbie , 5 days ago
-
RE: ASHP heat output monitoring
@carlo - not much better, is it. It looks more like a u...
By cathodeRay , 6 days ago
-
RE: Renewables & Heat Pumps in the News
this document extensively describes (in a non-blame, ne...
By Judith , 6 days ago
-
RE: Ecodan - Legionella Operation Time and Target Temperature
Once the white plastic cap is removed, my immersion loo...
By Old_Scientist , 7 days ago
-
RE: Replacing Refrigerant on Mitsubishi Heat Pump
@dgclimatecontrol I don't know, but they were not happy...
By DavidAlgarve , 7 days ago
-
RE: Why do we need pressurised systems?
A good question @toodles. My old open thermal store and...
By AllyFish , 1 week ago
-
RE: 300 Liter Tank - Do I have to heat it all?
Cross references for @martingale Background discussi...
By Transparent , 1 week ago
-
@ecobaker May I ask a question of you please. I too hav...
By Papahuhu , 1 week ago