Raising product standards for space heating
An interesting post from the government today:
Today we’ve published our consultation on raising product standards for space heating products. This includes increasing minimum performance standards for heat pumps and boilers entering the UK market, banning class I-III temperature controls and also re-banding energy labels so gas boilers are on the same scale as heat pumps but cannot be more than F-rated. You can read the consultation and how to respond here: https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/raising-product-standards-for-space-heating
Get a copy of The Ultimate Guide to Heat Pumps
Subscribe and follow our Homeowners’ Q&A heat pump podcast
A big 'hmmm' from me. 😉
The elephant in the sitting room is not the efficiency and rated performance of heat pumps when tested to BS EN 14511 or BS EN 14825 in a laboratory. Nearly all current and popular make and model ASHPs will comfortably pass the Government's minimum performance requirements now and the future requirements they are consulting on....
These proposals do not consider system effect. Testing an ASHP in a climate controlled laboratory with perfectly stable [artificial] control conditions will always give favourable results - there's no losses, inefficiencies or constraints. Put the same ASHP into a real-world retrofit in someone's house and it's not going to perform as well. It's not going to meet the performance declared under BS EN 14511 which MCS cut and paste in their database. It's the real-world performance that matters to the home-owner, because that's directly related to what it will cost them to run.
Currently, to my knowledge, only Heat Geek Installers are prepared to put their money where their mouth is and warrant a minimum installed SCOP inclusive of system effect.
In theory, if you drive up the efficiency of the heat source, then regardless of system effect, there should be some tangible improvement at the emitters and benefit to the homeowner, but that's not guaranteed - especially when the installation quality is pants with all sorts of complicated zone controllers, unsuitable thermostats, poor pipework insulation, buffers and circulating pumps a-plenty.
My initial thoughts, having just skimmed through the first of the four documents:
1: The anticipated cost savings for consumers are pretty low:
Those gains can be very easily wiped out by increased prices for items which are designed and tested to meet the proposed new standards...
... or by incorrect installation.
2: There are some statements which may not reflect 'good science':
Is this correct?
a: Why is the amount of water in the coil significant, whereas there's no suggestion of a Regulation to define the surface area?
My cylinder's coils are vaned, creating a massive surface area.
b: Is it really the case that a DHW cylinder might have almost as much water in the coil as it does in the body of the tank?
Can an installer please comment?!
3: As we're not an official organisation, I think any submission from forum members should read much as the response from @allyfish above.
We need to be telling them how it really is, in plain English.
4: Unlike the submissions from corporates and advisory bodies, we should be including photos, graphs, diagrams etc.
Most respondees to such consultations will send in a 'report' using black text on a white background.
We can do better than that!
5: The Questions embedded in the documents seem to be leading readers down a defined path.
My past experience of this practice is that the later questions tend to only make sense if the respondent has 'agreed' with the DESNZ thinking in the early questions.
I tend to pick that up and respond accordingly, such as
This question is biased. It assumes that the responses to questions 13-18 were in favour of achieving greater efficiency by defining standards for component parts of a heating system.
However, the greatest loss of efficiency is due to poor system design and shoddy installation.
Those significant losses can't be addressed by using components with higher specifications.
(NB the above is just an example. I haven't actually checked Questions 13-18 !)
6: We don't have to answer all questions.
Nor do we have to send in the whole lot in one go.
7: The consultation has an email address : spaceheatingstandards@energysecurity.gov.uk
Any of us can therefore send in additional relevant material which DESNZ hasn't consulted on.
Just because the authors have omitted something, shouldn't prevent any of us from writing in to say to so and then explain it !
If you feel suitably stirred up, you can send in a complete alternative strategy which would better achieve the cost savings and/or better reflect Government policy to attain Net Zero.
For example, I don't see why this Consultation should commence with para.2 in the Exec Summary proposing changes to regulations for boilers which won't come into force until 2028.
So just how does that comply with Net Zero strategy?! 🤔
Save energy... recycle electrons!
- 26 Forums
- 2,208 Topics
- 48.7 K Posts
- 136 Online
- 5,868 Members
Join Us!
Podcast Picks
Latest Posts
-
This is all part of the smoke and mirrors around heat p...
By cathodeRay , 24 minutes ago
-
Thank you. That simultaneously answers my question abou...
By Transparent , 60 minutes ago
-
RE: Heating Turned Off but Radiators Still Warm
What do you mean by 'turned off' exactly. Same questio...
By JamesPa , 2 hours ago
-
RE: Low Flow Rate Error - 8 kW Ideal Logic ASHP - Help!
@wh0am3ye - OK, starting to make sense, but it does mea...
By cathodeRay , 2 hours ago
-
RE: What crazy nonsense are inverter limits and why are they imposed?
My apologies @batpred I overlooked that you'd already I...
By Transparent , 2 hours ago
-
@editor fortunately we have a boiling water tap in the ...
By bontwoody , 11 hours ago
-
RE: Heat Pump Installers: Competence, Illusion and the Hard Truth Homeowners Must Face
@Fiona, I really don’t want to disappoint you, but I ha...
By Mars , 14 hours ago
-
RE: Are We Sleepwalking Into Another Race to the Bottom?
@dgclimatecontrol, hard to disagree with that. “Zero di...
By Mars , 14 hours ago
-
RE: Daikin 9kW to 8kW Swap Offer from Octopus
@matban I would have to check the CIBSE guide as we hav...
By ASHP-BOBBA , 14 hours ago
-
RE: Ecodan Energy Monitoring Pack
Hi @carpenterstation Did you ever resolve the energ...
By CAMorgan , 15 hours ago
-
RE: is a home battery without an EV worth it?
I would find it difficult to justify a battery without ...
By Batpred , 15 hours ago
-
RE: What is the Heat Geek Guarantee?
Very useful post, one observation: I can see why instal...
By Batpred , 16 hours ago
-
RE: Widespread failure of insulation installation
And there are different kinds I guess. One fri...
By Batpred , 16 hours ago
-
RE: Octopus tariffs - a quick comparison
Great summary, @majordennisbloodnok! I'd take the ho...
By Batpred , 17 hours ago
-
RE: RDSAP10 effect on existing heat pump EPC rating?
@mike-patrick I'm no expert... but believe your ASHP is...
By Tim441 , 19 hours ago
-
RE: Renewables & Heat Pumps in the News
Good News from NESO released today which d...
By Transparent , 20 hours ago
-
RE: Samsung Heat pump with Yonos Pico circulating pump running all the time
I agree with your last last sentence, but for another r...
By JamesPa , 20 hours ago
-
RE: New Fogstar 15.5kWh upright solution
Just wanted to share my experience with this kit, as I ...
By Batpred , 24 hours ago