Samsung's Cold Shoulder: Should Heat Pump Manufacturers Be More Accountable?
We recently encountered a concerning situation on the Renewable Heating Hub Forums that highlights a crucial question for the renewable heating industry: Should heat pump manufacturers take more responsibility when homeowners face issues with botched, subpar installations?
This question is especially relevant considering the actions of Daikin and Grant in the UK. They often send out engineers to inspect installations and advise installers on correcting systems that are not performing optimally using their equipment. To my mind, such proactive efforts quickly resolve issues and positively impact the brands' and industry's reputation.
So we recently came across David's story, a homeowner dealing with serious issues with his Samsung heat pump system. The main concern was an overly long defrost cycle, which affected the system's efficiency and reduced the comfort of his home. To seek a resolution, I took to LinkedIn (where I have a growing network of heating engineers and manufacturer contacts) to reach out to Samsung about the issue, and a senior product specialist and trainer from Samsung commented on David's situation. I've opted not to disclose the name of this employee in this post.
Initially, the interaction with the product specialist seemed promising; he engaged in a discussion about the problem, identifying what he believed were not the causes, without attributing any fault to the heat pump itself or suggesting any solutions. However, the conversation shifted abruptly when I politely questioned Samsung's responsibility and accountability to help homeowners facing problems due to poor installations, particularly those carried out by supposedly Samsung-trained installers. I also asked whether Samsung would send out one of its engineers like Daikin and Grant do to inspect David's system and to see if they could identify the fault.
Following my question, the Samsung specialist promptly deleted all his comments, likely recognising that his input (and lack of acceptable answers) could potentially attract negative attention towards Samsung's stance in not wanting to assist homeowners or consumers. Notably, his final comment, wishing David "good luck” in sorting out his dilemma was also removed.
This episode not only casts doubts on Samsung’s dedication to customer satisfaction post-sale but also highlights a potential wider issue within the industry. When installations fail to meet expectations, the lack of manufacturer intervention not only places a burden on homeowners but also negatively impacts the perception of renewable heating solutions.
The problematic installation in David's case, presumably carried out by a Samsung-approved installer, exhibited significant flaws, such as pipework that some reputed installers have labeled as "very poor", and even the Samsung specialist hinted that the performance of the heat pump was down to a poor installation. These issues point to potential shortcomings in Samsung’s installer approval processes.
While it's understood that manufacturers like Samsung, whose primary role is to supply and sell units, should not be directly blamed for installation errors made by independent installers, there is a pressing expectation for manufacturers to play a part in resolving such issues.
At a minimum, manufacturers should investigate reported installation problems, share findings with both the homeowner and installer, and suggest corrective actions. This approach not only helps ensure system efficiency but also bolsters customer satisfaction. As the market for renewable heating solutions grows, the way companies like Samsung handle these situations will be pivotal in shaping consumer confidence and promoting the adoption of green technologies.
So what do you think? Should heat manufacturers be more accountable when heat pumps are poorly installed?
Samsung's Reputation on Thin Ice
I'm aware that many homeowners on our forums and website have had successful Samsung heat pump installations and that their systems are performing very well.
However, Samsung's handling—or lack thereof—of David's case, combined with our recent personal experiences, suggests a shift in their customer support ethos. It seems they've grown complacent, resting on the laurels of their established reputation, and now show less concern for customer support post-purchase when things go wrong.
My skepticism about Samsung's commitment to its reputation, particularly regarding customer satisfaction and quality control, is not baseless. It's been further solidified by my own troublesome experience with a Samsung fridge freezer - it’s a long read, and I’m still outraged about how Samsung have dealt with us. Despite Samsung acknowledging the issue, their response lacked the concern one would expect. Our situation mirrors the frustrations expressed by many other homeowners who have encountered similar problems with their fridges, highlighting a pattern of disregard for customer grievances.
This personal experience points to a larger problem with Samsung's approach to customer service. The issue extends beyond the mere inconvenience of having to defrost an appliance; it touches on the basic expectations of reliability and support consumers have when they choose to invest in a brand. Samsung's apparent indifference to product malfunctions and customer concerns raises significant questions about their dedication to maintaining their reputation and ensuring customer satisfaction.
For me, as a consumer, I’ll never buy another Samsung appliance ever again based on their lack of after-sales customer support.
Pre-order: The Ultimate Guide to Heat Pumps
Subscribe and follow our Homeowners’ Q&A heat pump podcast
Posted by: @editor
We recently encountered a concerning situation on the Renewable Heating Hub Forums that highlights a crucial question for the renewable heating industry: Should heat pump manufacturers take more responsibility when homeowners face issues with botched, subpar installations?
This question is especially relevant considering the actions of Daikin and Grant in the UK. They often send out engineers to inspect installations and advise installers on correcting systems that are not performing optimally using their equipment. To my mind, such proactive efforts quickly resolve issues and positively impact the brands' and industry's reputation.
So we recently came across David's story, a homeowner dealing with serious issues with his Samsung heat pump system. The main concern was an overly long defrost cycle, which affected the system's efficiency and reduced the comfort of his home. To seek a resolution, I took to LinkedIn (where I have a growing network of heating engineers and manufacturer contacts) to reach out to Samsung about the issue, and a senior product specialist and trainer from Samsung commented on David's situation. I've opted not to disclose the name of this employee in this post.
Initially, the interaction with the product specialist seemed promising; he engaged in a discussion about the problem, identifying what he believed were not the causes, without attributing any fault to the heat pump itself or suggesting any solutions. However, the conversation shifted abruptly when I politely questioned Samsung's responsibility and accountability to help homeowners facing problems due to poor installations, particularly those carried out by supposedly Samsung-trained installers. I also asked whether Samsung would send out one of its engineers like Daikin and Grant do to inspect David's system and to see if they could identify the fault.
Following my question, the Samsung specialist promptly deleted all his comments, likely recognising that his input (and lack of acceptable answers) could potentially attract negative attention towards Samsung's stance in not wanting to assist homeowners or consumers. Notably, his final comment, wishing David "good luck” in sorting out his dilemma was also removed.
This episode not only casts doubts on Samsung’s dedication to customer satisfaction post-sale but also highlights a potential wider issue within the industry. When installations fail to meet expectations, the lack of manufacturer intervention not only places a burden on homeowners but also negatively impacts the perception of renewable heating solutions.
The problematic installation in David's case, presumably carried out by a Samsung-approved installer, exhibited significant flaws, such as pipework that some reputed installers have labeled as "very poor", and even the Samsung specialist hinted that the performance of the heat pump was down to a poor installation. These issues point to potential shortcomings in Samsung’s installer approval processes.
While it's understood that manufacturers like Samsung, whose primary role is to supply and sell units, should not be directly blamed for installation errors made by independent installers, there is a pressing expectation for manufacturers to play a part in resolving such issues.
At a minimum, manufacturers should investigate reported installation problems, share findings with both the homeowner and installer, and suggest corrective actions. This approach not only helps ensure system efficiency but also bolsters customer satisfaction. As the market for renewable heating solutions grows, the way companies like Samsung handle these situations will be pivotal in shaping consumer confidence and promoting the adoption of green technologies.
So what do you think? Should heat manufacturers be more accountable when heat pumps are poorly installed?
Samsung's Reputation on Thin Ice
I'm aware that many homeowners on our forums and website have had successful Samsung heat pump installations and that their systems are performing very well.
However, Samsung's handling—or lack thereof—of David's case, combined with our recent personal experiences, suggests a shift in their customer support ethos. It seems they've grown complacent, resting on the laurels of their established reputation, and now show less concern for customer support post-purchase when things go wrong.
My skepticism about Samsung's commitment to its reputation, particularly regarding customer satisfaction and quality control, is not baseless. It's been further solidified by my own troublesome experience with a Samsung fridge freezer - it’s a long read, and I’m still outraged about how Samsung have dealt with us. Despite Samsung acknowledging the issue, their response lacked the concern one would expect. Our situation mirrors the frustrations expressed by many other homeowners who have encountered similar problems with their fridges, highlighting a pattern of disregard for customer grievances.
This personal experience points to a larger problem with Samsung's approach to customer service. The issue extends beyond the mere inconvenience of having to defrost an appliance; it touches on the basic expectations of reliability and support consumers have when they choose to invest in a brand. Samsung's apparent indifference to product malfunctions and customer concerns raises significant questions about their dedication to maintaining their reputation and ensuring customer satisfaction.
For me, as a consumer, I’ll never buy another Samsung appliance ever again based on their lack of after-sales customer support.
Samsung's Reputation?
My Samsung Heat Pump was , initially "installed" without an Expansion Vessel, Flow Sensor , Thermostat OR PRV .
The Flow Sensor, discovered in an unopened Box left in my kitchen was fitted in Four different locations on my pipework before the "discovery that There was No water in the Primary Water circuit " some three weeks after the start of the "Installation".
My "installer" then "discovered " A Heat Exchanger that he had "missed during the initial "Installation.
At this point I contacted the NIC asking for advice , being told to contact Samsung Dalliam in Wigan.
After several E-mails SAMSUNG Dalliam , the repair and support arm of Samsung, agreed to "fit a Buffer Tank for Winter De-icing".
My then "installer's Support Manager" intervened in Apparent Rage saying that "his Boys were perfectly capable of installing the Buffer Tank without the "absurd costs" of SAMSUNG-DALLIAM.
SAMSUNG-DALLIAM having asked for ~£1500 per Engineer per day plus 60 per mile when travelling from Wigan!
MY "installer " was STRUCK_OFF for "Technical Incompetence and failure to respond to E-mails".
My "installer " blamed this fiasco on their "support Manager" who was promptly fired!.
Two months later a 50 litre 4 pipe Buffer was "Discovered Under the Desk of the now departed "Support Manager".
Two Engineers appeared on 26th October 2022 saying that "they has discovered this Buffer but did not know how or where to fit it !.
The Engineers fitted the 4 pipe Buffer using only two of the four pipes to connect across the output ports of the Heat Pump, as per Kensa.
Subsequently, My MSP Contacted SAMSUNG-DALLIAM arranging a further exchange of E-mails.
SAMSUNG-DALLIAM in November 2023 said that " I should contact a newly set up, but Samsung trained, company in Glasgow ".
I was informed by the newly Set up Samsung Trained Glasgow Outlet that " I would be expected to pay for a complete system re-build ".
My Heat Pump remains an incompetently installed Unaffordable! Oscillator!
-
Sudden drop in COP
2 weeks ago
-
Samsung E911 intermittent issue
7 months ago
-
How can I programme a setback for my Samsung Gen6 8kW heat pump?
9 months ago
-
The Changing Jet Stream Could Challenge UK Air Source Heat Pumps
1 year ago
-
Any installer recommendations for Samsung ASHP?
1 year ago
- 26 Forums
- 2,136 Topics
- 46.8 K Posts
- 23 Online
- 5,662 Members
Join Us!
Podcast Picks
Latest Posts
-
RE: Does anyone have experience of a smart water meter?
Thanks, @technogeek. So far as I can make out, whilst...
By Majordennisbloodnok , 2 hours ago
-
RE: Mitsubishi PAR-WT60R-E Wireless Controller installation
@morgan They have been paired once but it was thought b...
By DavidAlgarve , 4 hours ago
-
RE: Isolating the system for a planned power cut
A great many ground-mounted local substation transforme...
By Transparent , 4 hours ago
-
RE: Heat Pump Servicing & Maintenance – Good Value or Rip-Off?
Having bit the bullet and paid £250 for a service, our ...
By Old_Scientist , 1 day ago
-
@bontwoody me too. I've contacted Heat Geek today, and ...
By Mars , 1 day ago
-
New heat pump heating system underperforming in Italy... Advice needed!
hi all, first post! I've just renovated a house in sout...
By robinlawrie , 1 day ago
-
RE: Anyone still weathering it out with Agile?
I went to Agile when I had solar installed July last ye...
By NJT , 2 days ago
-
RE: Mitsu Wireless Controller and MelCloud
Well it has now become obvious that the installation of...
By DavidAlgarve , 2 days ago
-
RE: Say hello and introduce yourself
Whilst you're busy installing services (pipes and wires...
By Transparent , 3 days ago
-
RE: New Vaillant aroTherm Plus in black - When will it come to the UK?
@editor I know it was formally announced at Ish the oth...
By PatrickVito , 4 days ago
-
@moman0311 welcome to the forums. I've received your em...
By Mars , 4 days ago
-
RE: Thermostat for Ideal Logic Air with 3 zone support
No harm at all in plumbing it as 3 zones, I would have ...
By JamesPa , 5 days ago
-
RE: ASHP heat output monitoring
@carlo I see there is a discussion in Facebook user gro...
By Tim441 , 5 days ago
-
RE: Flexi-Orb Heat Pump Scheme: A Game-Changer for the UK's Heat Pump Industry
MCS have set a potential trap in the new version of MCS...
By JamesPa , 6 days ago
-
RE: Who has a V2G EV installation
General comment on battery care... I guess if ev is on ...
By Tim441 , 1 week ago
-
@old_scientist like for like comparisons are almost imp...
By Tim441 , 1 week ago
-
RE: Who's your electricity provider and what's your tariff?
@old_scientist There is an option in the Tesla app that...
By Toodles , 1 week ago
-
RE: Octopus Cosy & Octopus EV + bidirectional smart tariff, together. What, eh?
@old_scientist me too. Just installed my new heat pump ...
By Eliuccio , 1 week ago
-
RE: Is your heat pump insured?
Yup just spoke to Privilege to inform them of my impend...
By Scalextrix , 1 week ago
-
RE: Forum updates, announcements & issues
Just to keep everyone in the loop, as the site continue...
By Mars , 1 week ago