Are MCS are finally improving (some of) their guidelines?
Look:
Is this going to be useful guys?
Just trying to move it back into contention.
is it a useful but small step or irrelevant for example?
2kW + Growatt & 4kW +Sunnyboy PV on south-facing roof Solar thermal. 9.5kWh Givenergy battery with AC3. MVHR. Vaillant 7kW ASHP (very pleased with it) open system operating on WC
Encouragement of installers to take account of the emitters must be a good thing. It might make it more difficult for the likes of Octopus to get away with designing around 50C flow temperatures in order to minimise the cost of replacing radiators with bigger ones.
@johnr I think OE argue that the lower running costs associated with a lower flow temperature would take years to offset the cost of using the higher temperatures without the need to replace the original radiators. I don’t know that this idea is the greatest bit of logic ever thought up though! Regards, Toodles.
Toodles, he heats his home with cold draughts and cooks his food with magnets.
This should be a step in the right direction. One of the biggest shortcomings of the previous method was the reliance on assumed flow temperatures without properly accounting for the impact of different emitters or system design. Using SCoP as a blanket metric often painted an overly optimistic picture of real-world performance, especially in homes with legacy radiator systems that weren’t designed for low-temperature heating.
By incorporating emitter type and property-specific heat loss into the calculation, this update should, in theory, give homeowners a much clearer idea of what to expect in terms of efficiency and running costs. The added warnings around radiator sizing are also welcome… too often, installers assume existing emitters will work fine without verifying whether they can deliver enough heat at lower flow temperatures. This happened to us.
That said, the real test will be in how installers apply these changes. An improved methodology is only as good as the people using it, and there’s always the risk of it becoming another “tick-box exercise” if corners are cut.
It’ll be interesting to see how this plays out and whether the changes lead to better installs or just more paperwork. Fingers crossed it’s the former, but I suspect we won’t see any initial improvements.
On a semi-related note, it’s gone eerily quiet on MCS2.0 which is where the big changes are coming. When I was in touch with their PR team last year they were buoyant and excited about it being unveiled in Jan/Feb 2025. Nothing so far.
Buy Bodge Buster – Homeowner Air Source Heat Pump Installation Guide: https://amzn.to/3NVndlU
From Zero to Heat Pump Hero: https://amzn.to/4bWkPFb
Subscribe and follow our Homeowners’ Q&A heat pump podcast
Posted by: @toodles@johnr I think OE argue that the lower running costs associated with a lower flow temperature would take years to offset the cost of using the higher temperatures without the need to replace the original radiators. I don’t know that this idea is the greatest bit of logic ever thought up though! Regards, Toodles.
It sort of applied to 🐙 installations when they were cheap and TJ himself, Mr 🐙 Heat pump head honcho, explained the capex v running cost ratio thing. I asked him directly. He told me it was a 'middle route'.
But their installations are bigger money now so that justification doesn't really wash any more.
But not only does more radiator volume give lower running costs it is also better for an efficient heat pump and less compressor stops and starts.
The update of MCS 031 has been heavily criticised by many of the better and higher SCOP achieving installers over on LinkedIn, etc. MCS 031 update is intended to close the performance gap between predicted SCOP and actual SCOP. Historically, real-world SCOPs have been significantly lower than predicted. You don't say?!
There are differences in SCOPs between different heat pump manufacturers - some are more efficient than others. The MCS 031 does away with this, putting all heat pumps on an assumed level SCOP. This might not be a bad thing given that some SCOP data published by certain OEMs is very optimistic, and possibly even dishonest. (Not that long ago a Chinese OEM producing units under several branded names sold in Europe was busted filing false data that TuV had signed off without thoroughly checking. Either gross negligence on the part of TuV, or a brown envelope job to turn a blind eye - we'll never know the truth.)
That said, the main reason for predicted vs actual SCOP shortfall is not the heat pump or variance between OEM product SCOPs, it's due to poor hydronic system design and installation - using unsuitable components, thermostats and zone controls. The MCS 031 update does nothing to address this.
So, once again, rather than MCS acknowledging this to be the case, and produce standards and methods that up-skill the installation quality, raise the SCOPs achieved, and lower the energy cost to homeowners, they've just dumbed down the performance estimate, to narrow the delta between predicted SCOP and actual SCOP.
Small wonder most of the better performing retrofit installers think this is a backward and unwelcome step by MCS. They are now obliged to give pre-sale SCOP estimates identical to all other installers. SCOPs that they know their much more efficient & thorough install & control method, which is likely to cost more to install, will exceed. At pre-sale stage, the Heat Geek Gurus are in direct competition with the bodge-it and scarper ex boiler bashers who will marry up a heat pump to a complicated and unsuitable hydronic circuit & control, grab the cash and dash.
MCS 031 update lowers the bar, it doesn't raise it.
I suppose it achieves what it is designed to achieve, namely to protect installers. Just like everything MCS so far as I can tell.
He who pays the piper calls the tune!
4kW peak of solar PV since 2011; EV and a 1930s house which has been partially renovated to improve its efficiency. 7kW Vaillant heat pump.
- 22 Forums
- 2,051 Topics
- 44.7 K Posts
- 56 Online
- 3,278 Members
Join Us!
Trusted Installers
Struggling to find a reliable heat pump installer? A poor installation can lead to inefficiencies and high running costs. We now connect homeowners with top-rated installers who deliver quality work and excellent service.
✅ Verified, trusted & experienced installers
✅ Nationwide coverage expanding
✅ Special offers available
Latest Posts
-
RE: How to disable radiator heating in LG HM161MR
I would only make changes after 24 hrs, but we have UFH...
By Johnmo , 4 minutes ago
-
@johnmo yes I can believe that. It seems to be human na...
By SUNandAIR , 2 hours ago
-
RE: Help optimising my system!
I would be doing things a little more simply. Your heat...
By Johnmo , 3 hours ago
-
RE: Yes, the "zoning with ASHP" topic again...
@johnmo Thanks, Johnmo — fair points as always. I ...
By HarryRea , 3 hours ago
-
RE: Warm weather and heat pumps.
Ours is still on - stat sits at 23 all year round and i...
By HughF , 5 hours ago
-
RE: Renewables & Heat Pumps in the News
If you want to read a huge amount of speculation, fabri...
By Judith , 15 hours ago
-
RE: Solar Power Output – Let’s Compare Generation Figures
@andris hi. Whilst I understand your logic, the FiT is ...
By JulianC , 17 hours ago
-
Thanks it doesn’t provide anymore info just says UD-0
By Gary , 17 hours ago
-
IVT Greenline high pressure switch and electrical cassette errors
I have an IVT Greenline HT Plus C heat pump that is con...
By tdudgeon , 20 hours ago
-
RE: Volumisers in Heat Pump Systems: Does Placement Matter?
Not sure if you have the defrost cycle and what happens...
By Johnmo , 20 hours ago
-
RE: Hydronic plinth heaters and ASHPs
Thanks. I suspected I was overthinking that part. ...
By benson , 23 hours ago
-
RE: Additional Battery v Wind Turbine v Ripple
There was a call today for Ripple investors and amongst...
By Judith , 2 days ago
-
-
RE: Commencing on an ASHP Installation Process
I think you may very well be right and of course A2A ca...
By JamesPa , 3 days ago
-
-
RE: Agile: average import cost vs other tariffs?
@old_scientist We are with SSEN and our G99 application...
By Toodles , 4 days ago
-
RE: ASHP Ecodan L9 error - No Heating but Hot Water
@phoenix15, @heacol cover your area… I’d strongly recom...
By Mars , 4 days ago
-
RE: Potentially more choice including air to air heat pump grants
@jeff Such documents are far too wordy for my ‘daily re...
By Toodles , 5 days ago
-
RE: Getting the best out of a heat pump - is Homely a possible answer?
@grahaml I cannot agree that it is a small percentage o...
By benson , 6 days ago