ÀSHP heat loss - how close to perfect can we get?
I'm looking to establish the best way to assess heat loss, that is MCS compliant.
Can the results of blower tests be factored in to the air changes?
I've never had one done but I assume if I get a whole house result then I can factor it in, on a room by room basis somehow.
Welcome to the forums @larry. We covered heat loss calculations in a recent podcast featuring our very own @jamespa
In direct reply to your question, to ensure MCS compliance when assessing heat loss, it’s essential to follow the MCS guidance on heat loss calculations, which is typically based on room-by-room analysis using U-values for walls, windows and doors, along with ventilation losses.
Regarding blower door tests, yes (as far as I’m aware), the results can be factored into the air changes component of the calculation. Typically, the result is expressed in air changes per hour. For MCS purposes, you can use this value in place of standard assumptions for infiltration rates, potentially giving you a more accurate figure.
However, to apply this on a room-by-room basis, you’ll need to adjust the whole house result proportionally for each room, based on its volume and any specific factors that may affect air leakage in that space (external walls, windows, etc.).
Buy Bodge Buster – Homeowner Air Source Heat Pump Installation Guide: https://amzn.to/3NVndlU
From Zero to Heat Pump Hero: https://amzn.to/4bWkPFb
Subscribe and follow our Homeowners’ Q&A heat pump podcast
Thanks @editor
I watched that video yesterday - Excellent.
I've been looking into the blower ACH50 / 20 method according to the SAP guidance. I’ve also just read a study that indicates this divisor could actually be as high for 37 in the UK.
This all ties in with the fact that your associate in the video has never seen a blower test that indicated over 1 ACPH.
I believe we're permitted to take further evidence into account within the MCS process, so surely a blower test should me mandatory, at least for pre-2000 builds.
Would it be considered reasonable to adjust the notional room by room ACPH on a volumetric basis, to give a whole house ACPH equivalent to the blower test?
How would we best integrate the point-considerarions such as open flues etc...?
Anyone's thoughts would be greatly appreciated.
Posted by: @larrysurely a blower test should me (sic) mandatory
Any talk of 'mandatory' starts the hairs on the back of my neck rising. In close proximity to any mention of MCS, a discredited bunch of goons and stooges if ever there was, and my blood pressure starts to rise as well.
The whole business of heat loss calculations is very far from satisfactory. Posts on this forum and no doubt elsewhere using measured estimates of heat loss suggest the standard calculations are very inaccurate. In my case, for example, the calculations estimate a heat loss of just over 12kW, while an estimate based on how much heat is actually consumed comes closer to 8kW. If that is correct, it may well not be, then the calculated figure is a 50% over-estimate of the real figure. Furthermore, the standard MCS method is pure whatiffery (what if the U values of my walls is X, the U value of my windows is Y etc), all done by the book, with the only actual measurements taken being dimensions. Adding in measured as opposed to guessed air changes per hour values might improve things a bit, but if the rest of the calculations are way out, then just having more accurate air change data still wont produce an accurate heat loss.
What we need is empirical evidence. I haven't done a proper literature search, perhaps it is time I made a start. Or perhaps someone already knows of relevant studies?
Midea 14kW (for now...) ASHP heating both building and DHW
Hi @cathoderay
There's lots of good empirical studies out there. Solid wall real-world heat losses by Historic England is a good one. Ventilation rates, etc.
My understanding is that we're free to vary the MCS spec, with good reason and by agreement with the client, but we then carry the can.
Does my method of adjusting ACPHnatural based on the ACH50 blower test seem reasonable to you?
I've got reasonable faith in modern u values, it's really just the older properties and ventilation rates that mess it all up.
Does anyone know how MVHR should be factored in too?
Posted by: @larryThere's lots of good empirical studies out there. Solid wall real-world heat losses by Historic England is a good one. Ventilation rates, etc.
Thanks, that's useful to know. I'll see what I can dig up.
Posted by: @larryMy understanding is that we're free to vary the MCS spec, with good reason and by agreement with the client, but we then carry the can.
I guess that may mean you are an installer (which is fine - all are welcome here!)? But doesn't deviating from MCS block many grants? I'm pretty sure my installation had to be MCS compliant to get a grant (one from the 2021/2022 LAD scheme).
Posted by: @larryDoes my method of adjusting ACPHnatural based on the ACH50 blower test seem reasonable to you?
I've got reasonable faith in modern u values, it's really just the older properties and ventilation rates that mess it all up.
Yes it does, but it adds a new layer of complication and expense, to what is already a complicated and expensive process. If it can be shown to add value, then the case for using it becomes much stronger.
My property is a classic older property where you might expect the ventilation rates really would mess things up adversely, ie increase the heat loss, but the odd/curious thing is the empirical heat loss I mentioned earlier (~8kW) is much less that the calculated loss (12kW). If the ~8kW is the real heat loss, then either the presumed U values or the air changes/hour (or both) used in the calculations are out of whack.
Midea 14kW (for now...) ASHP heating both building and DHW
This is the solid walls one....
https://historicengland.org.uk/images-books/publications/spab-rr1-uvalue-report/
Posted by: @cathoderayI guess that may mean you are an installer (which is fine - all are welcome here!)?
Studied Mech.Eng and used to fit heat pumps about 15 years ago. Now I do surveys and sales for an installation company. Always trying to learn more and refine the process, despite the obstacles in our way.
Posted by: @cathoderayIf the ~8kW is the real heat loss, then either the presumed U values or the air changes/hour (or both) used in the calculations are out of whack.
No doubt both will be out.
If MCS could give specific guidance on the application of blower tests then we could all get a lot closer.
Building fabrics do need better consideration than the typical surveyor will give them; but I'd say that with due diligence, we can get pretty close on most fabrics over the last century or two.
It's really the ventilation, internal adventitous gains, convection etc. That we need more practical guidance on.
Posted by: @larryStudied Mech.Eng and used to fit heat pumps about 15 years ago. Now I do surveys and sales for an installation company. Always trying to learn more and refine the process, despite the obstacles in our way.
Very good to have your experience and expertise here, I am sure you have much to offer which I am sure others will welcome.
Thanks too for the U Value report link, I have just had a look and in the Intro it says "The key findings concern the differences between in situ test results and those less favourable to traditionally built walls obtained through theoretical calculation models." If I've read that right, I think it might be saying 'theoretical calculation models' over-estimate ([are] 'less favourable to') heat loss for 'traditionally built walls'. If so, interesting stuff!
Midea 14kW (for now...) ASHP heating both building and DHW
Posted by: @cathoderayIf I've read that right, I think it might be saying 'theoretical calculation models' over-estimate ([are] 'less favourable to') heat loss for 'traditionally built walls'. If so, interesting stuff!
Very much so.... some light for the long winter evenings ahead!
Posted by: @cathoderayIf I've read that right, I think it might be saying 'theoretical calculation models' over-estimate ([are] 'less favourable to') heat loss for 'traditionally built walls'. If so, interesting stuff!
Very much so.... some light for the long winter evenings ahead!
- 22 Forums
- 2,073 Topics
- 45.5 K Posts
- 19 Online
- 3,354 Members
Join Us!
Trusted Installers
Struggling to find a reliable heat pump installer? A poor installation can lead to inefficiencies and high running costs. We now connect homeowners with top-rated installers who deliver quality work and excellent service.
✅ Verified, trusted & experienced installers
✅ Nationwide coverage expanding
✅ Special offers available
Latest Posts
-
RE: Solar Power Output – Let’s Compare Generation Figures
510kWh of solar PV from my 4kW Hyundai panels and SMA S...
By JulianC , 12 hours ago
-
RE: Is my Samsung heat pump working too well?
Thats in itself is interesting. I have a Vaillant heat...
By JamesPa , 13 hours ago
-
RE: Jokes and fun posts about heat pumps and renewables
@transparent Not a swell season then ☹️
By Toodles , 16 hours ago
-
RE: 5 Star Service from Havenwise
Oh good! I was wondering when/if you might pick them ...
By Transparent , 2 days ago
-
RE: Air Changes per Hour - ACH and the MCS requirement
update - my old installer insisted on a heat loss of 11...
By MatWin , 2 days ago
-
I agree it's not very helpful. Generally, the max heat ...
By Old_Scientist , 2 days ago
-
RE: Commencing on an ASHP Installation Process
I think therein lies the problem. Ratio of quotes to i...
By JamesPa , 3 days ago
-
RE: Why Your MCS-Certified Installer Might Not Be As Competent As You Think
Hive and most other smart thermostats don't play well w...
By JamesPa , 3 days ago
-
RE: Enabling WiFi: Samsung ASHP on Smart Things App
Thanks for the input. I've been running various experim...
By Grahamh-uk , 3 days ago
-
RE: Radiators downstairs are cooler at the bottom after ASHP install
@melonbuffet Hi, this sounds great is you are getting 5...
By ASHP-BOBBA , 3 days ago
-
RE: Ripped Off: How UK Homeowners Are Paying Gas Prices for Wind Energy
I believe there's another reason that network upgrades ...
By Transparent , 3 days ago
-
RE: What’s the modern take on advised types of insulation?
@jeff I am sorry @jeff if I have misunderstood what you...
By Toodles , 4 days ago
-
RE: Getting the best out of a heat pump - is Homely a possible answer?
@editor Cobbler’s Mantra that!
By Toodles , 4 days ago
-
RE: Renewables & Heat Pumps in the News
Australia Blue, the first wind farm in Western Victoria...
By Morgan , 5 days ago
-
RE: Flow rate discrepancy between ASHP and manifold
That's useful thanks, I hadn't seen that table before. ...
By AshRolls , 5 days ago
-
In principle I agree, @johnmo, but with provisos. The...
By Majordennisbloodnok , 6 days ago
-
RE: Heat pump installation and BUS Grant timings
@jamespa Thats how I understood it too. 🙂
By ASHP-BOBBA , 6 days ago
-
RE: Antifreeze top up for my heat pump - is this a rip off?
@sallyl That sounds about right if they are re-filling ...
By Brendon Uys , 6 days ago
-
I wouldn't be so sure about that. Heat pump designers ...
By JamesPa , 6 days ago