Low Loss Header is losing 1.5c from flow temperature
@iancalderbank thanks Ian
yes there is a drop in flow temp across the LLH but there is a more or less equal rise in return temp across the LLH. These were tested with a separate thermistor…
I don’t know if there is a way of working out a quantifiable energy cost for the increased generated DT to create the desired DT at the emitters but perhaps it isn’t as big as I’m thinking it might be?
thanks for your insights on this
Posted by: @sunandair@iancalderbank thanks Ian
yes there is a drop in flow temp across the LLH but there is a more or less equal rise in return temp across the LLH.
doesn't matter. check the datasheet 2 posts up. the higher the flowT, the worse the COP. same for any heat pump.
also you are talking about loss of DT, but in your sketch, DT is the same both sides, which it would be if flow rate is the same. heatgeeks explanation is pretty good as they usually are https://www.heatgeek.com/low-loss-headers/
My octopus signup link https://share.octopus.energy/ebony-deer-230
210m2 house, Samsung 16kw Gen6 ASHP Self installed: Single circulation loop , PWM modulating pump.
My public ASHP stats: https://heatpumpmonitor.org/system/view?id=45
11.9kWp of PV
41kWh of Battery storage (3x Powerwall 2)
2x BEVs
Posted by: @iancalderbankDT is the same both sides,
hi Ian,
here is my sketch again what do you mean that the DT Is the same both sides? The sketch shows a 1degC drop in one direction and a 1degC rise in the other direction…. Is that what you mean?
the Heat Geek info looks interesting
Will look in due course… thanks
Posted by: @sunandair@iancalderbank thanks Ian
yes there is a drop in flow temp across the LLH but there is a more or less equal rise in return temp across the LLH. These were tested with a separate thermistor…
I don’t know if there is a way of working out a quantifiable energy cost for the increased generated DT to create the desired DT at the emitters but perhaps it isn’t as big as I’m thinking it might be?
thanks for your insights on this
Assuming I understand the question correctly (which I may not) then yes there is. Plot COP vs flow temperature, then work out the COP (at some representative OAT eg 7C) for the two 'alternative' flow temperatures required to achieve the same FT at the emitters (ie with and without the LLH, or more simpl the original design FT and that plus the reduction in FT across the LLH). Then use that to work out the change in energy consumption due to requiring a higher FT from the ASHP.
So for example with a Mitsubishi R32 11.2kW the COP at 7/40 is 4.55 and its 5.11 at 35/40. That translates to a 12% increase in consumption for a 5C rise in Flow temp, so about 4% for a 1.5C rise.
Here is a quick table for the 11.2kW Mitsi
This accounts only for the reduction in thermodynamic efficiency of the heat pump, not for any energy losses in the LLH (which, assuming its well insulated, should be negligible). It also assumes that the pump speeds (l/s) both sides of the LLH are approximately equal (if they aren't then youare forcing mixing which is a bad idea)
4kW peak of solar PV since 2011; EV and a 1930s house which has been partially renovated to improve its efficiency. 7kW Vaillant heat pump.
@jamespa perfect….
thanks James
Added
(We tried a number of secondary pump settings until we got the lowest change in DT but we couldn’t do much better than 1degC. At least we are dealing with constant flow rates…. )
Ive already built my secondary pump bypass….
DT is a phrase used too much in HP discussions, one needs to be clear about between what points the difference is being measured. Its normal that DT is used to refer to the difference between flowT and returnT. In your case, DT on the left side is 5C. (39-34). DT on the right side is also 5C (40-35). DT times flow rate gives you the heat energy transfer rate, which has to be the same each side - there is no input or output of energy in the LLH. If the flow rates are different on each side then DT would be different each side, but the energy transfer would still be (MUST BE) the same. The LLH isn't "losing" energy (it can't, its not an emitter - assuming its well insulated).
But what the LLH does, is force mixing to happen, which MUST reduce the flowT on the emitter side. this reduces the efficiency of the system as a whole, once you consider how the energy input device (the HP) works. To get an emitter temp of 39C, you have to run your HP at 40C. This costs you x% in HP efficiency - its guaranteed, for any HP, the higher the HP flowT, the less efficient it is. (as per jamespa, probably around 3% for 1C). If your drop in FlowT is worse, this % gets higher (= worse).
If you have a poorly balanced LLH - widely differing flowT's - then the drop in flowT would be worse, thus increasing the need to run the HP at an even higher temperature OR leading to too-cold emitters that don't warm the house - thus giving an even less efficient system with an even worse COP.
If you've already got it down to only a 1 degree drop in flowT across the LLH, by tweaking your secondary pump, thats pretty good - implies you've got it down the least amount of mixing that you can (whilst still keeping the LLH). the only way to get better will be to repipe without it. additional benefit of that is you only need 1 pump, and you can also potentially use a variable circulation speed (either a CP or PP pump , or a PWM pump controlled by the HP, or a DT-targeted pump), starting point for that discussion should be what is the pump within your ASHP capable of.
My octopus signup link https://share.octopus.energy/ebony-deer-230
210m2 house, Samsung 16kw Gen6 ASHP Self installed: Single circulation loop , PWM modulating pump.
My public ASHP stats: https://heatpumpmonitor.org/system/view?id=45
11.9kWp of PV
41kWh of Battery storage (3x Powerwall 2)
2x BEVs
- 26 Forums
- 2,208 Topics
- 48.7 K Posts
- 30 Online
- 5,868 Members
Join Us!
Podcast Picks
Latest Posts
-
🏴☠️🔭😂...
By Pirate Rich , 5 hours ago
-
@editor fortunately we have a boiling water tap in the ...
By bontwoody , 8 hours ago
-
RE: Low Flow Rate Error - 8 kW Ideal Logic ASHP - Help!
@wh0am3ye super, glad your back up and running.
By ASHP-BOBBA , 10 hours ago
-
RE: What crazy nonsense are inverter limits and why are they imposed?
A DNO allowing 5kW export on a single-phase supply is u...
By Transparent , 10 hours ago
-
RE: Heat Pump Installers: Competence, Illusion and the Hard Truth Homeowners Must Face
@Fiona, I really don’t want to disappoint you, but I ha...
By Mars , 10 hours ago
-
RE: Are We Sleepwalking Into Another Race to the Bottom?
@dgclimatecontrol, hard to disagree with that. “Zero di...
By Mars , 10 hours ago
-
RE: Daikin 9kW to 8kW Swap Offer from Octopus
@matban I would have to check the CIBSE guide as we hav...
By ASHP-BOBBA , 11 hours ago
-
RE: Ecodan Energy Monitoring Pack
Hi @carpenterstation Did you ever resolve the energ...
By CAMorgan , 12 hours ago
-
RE: is a home battery without an EV worth it?
I would find it difficult to justify a battery without ...
By Batpred , 12 hours ago
-
RE: What is the Heat Geek Guarantee?
Very useful post, one observation: I can see why instal...
By Batpred , 12 hours ago
-
RE: Widespread failure of insulation installation
And there are different kinds I guess. One fri...
By Batpred , 13 hours ago
-
@drei - there is definitely something not right, notwit...
By cathodeRay , 13 hours ago
-
RE: Octopus tariffs - a quick comparison
Great summary, @majordennisbloodnok! I'd take the ho...
By Batpred , 14 hours ago
-
RE: RDSAP10 effect on existing heat pump EPC rating?
@mike-patrick I'm no expert... but believe your ASHP is...
By Tim441 , 16 hours ago
-
RE: Renewables & Heat Pumps in the News
Good News from NESO released today which d...
By Transparent , 16 hours ago
-
RE: Samsung Heat pump with Yonos Pico circulating pump running all the time
I agree with your last last sentence, but for another r...
By JamesPa , 16 hours ago
-
RE: New Fogstar 15.5kWh upright solution
Just wanted to share my experience with this kit, as I ...
By Batpred , 21 hours ago
-
RE: The Hidden Secret to a Successful Heat Pump: Pipe Size Matters
@jamespa And then there was the window company I had...
By davidnolan22 , 21 hours ago