Ecodan - flow rates, sensors, settings
Looking for some guiding principles / a fuller-understanding here as not really sure what's right / going on!
Mitsubishi's default min/max settings for 'flow sensor' are 5 / 100.
Our Ecodan is reading from a Sika VVX20Mitsubishi flow sensor on the primary return before the filter.
The Mitsubishi manual states "*18 Do not change the [2 x flow] setting since it is set according to the specification of flow sensor attached to the hydrobox."
The Sika sensor states its range is "5..80 l/m".
Flow rate has been measured at various pump speeds using an 'analogue' flow meter. With the FTC settings at 5 / 100, the Ecodan reports flow 2-3l/m lower than the analogue.
If the FTC settings are changed to 5 / 80 (to match the actual sensor, as Mitsubishi manual states!), the flow rate reported on the FTC goes down - anecdotally by up to 7-8 l/m.
The reported figures at 5 / 100 can be manipulated (up) to roughly match the analogue meter's flow rate if the FTC min flow setting is increased to 7.
Regardless of the min/max flow settings values and reported flow rate, the Grundfos primary pump is still sending the water round at the same rate (according to the analogue flow meter) - therefore does anyone have any thoughts on how the FTC should be configured and what effects (elsewhere) there might be if it were configured 'properly' (i.e. min/max flow at 5 + 80 per sensor) given the resulting lower reported flow rates?
Posted by: @rhh2348Grundfos primary pump is still sending the water round at the same rate
Is the pump controlled to be variable speed? A second plug connected?
Not sure but believe the circulation pump speed is modulated to help manage dT. Sitting stationary may not do anything other than fixed speed.
Posted by: @rhh2348Looking for some guiding principles / a fuller-understanding here as not really sure what's right / going on!
Mitsubishi's default min/max settings for 'flow sensor' are 5 / 100.
Our Ecodan is reading from a Sika VVX20Mitsubishi flow sensor on the primary return before the filter.
The Mitsubishi manual states "*18 Do not change the [2 x flow] setting since it is set according to the specification of flow sensor attached to the hydrobox."
The Sika sensor states its range is "5..80 l/m".
Flow rate has been measured at various pump speeds using an 'analogue' flow meter. With the FTC settings at 5 / 100, the Ecodan reports flow 2-3l/m lower than the analogue.
If the FTC settings are changed to 5 / 80 (to match the actual sensor, as Mitsubishi manual states!), the flow rate reported on the FTC goes down - anecdotally by up to 7-8 l/m.
The reported figures at 5 / 100 can be manipulated (up) to roughly match the analogue meter's flow rate if the FTC min flow setting is increased to 7.
Regardless of the min/max flow settings values and reported flow rate, the Grundfos primary pump is still sending the water round at the same rate (according to the analogue flow meter) - therefore does anyone have any thoughts on how the FTC should be configured and what effects (elsewhere) there might be if it were configured 'properly' (i.e. min/max flow at 5 + 80 per sensor) given the resulting lower reported flow rates?
Achieving an accurate flow measurement is probably the more difficult of the four main parameters.
As you state the Sika data shows the VVX20 standard model to have a specified flow range of 5 to 80 lpm, whereas the optional extra flow meter PAC-FS01-E detailed in the Ecodan manual would appear to have a specified flow range of 5 to 100 lpm. The output from both flow meters is stated to be 0.5 volts dc at 5 lpm and 3.5 volts dc at full range. By measuring the dc voltage output from the flow meter under steady flow conditions it should be possible to ascertain which of the ranges most accurately matches your analogue flow meter. Sika claim the accuracy to be +/- 0.75% at flow rates below 50% of full range.
What analogue flow meter are you using as a reference? What is its range and accuracy?
As I stated previously, the actual flow rate measurement is not that critical as long as it does not cause any alarms that stop the heat pump from functioning. I believe that the flow rate measurement may be used in estimating the thermal energy output of the heat pump, but this tends not to be too accurate on most heat pumps.
As mentioned above, the one I have 1) has the MITSUBISHI suffix after the VVX20, and 2) states 5..80 lpm on the front - I can't find much info or sufficiently-high res images of the part number you kindly advised, but would have expected the 'default' (or most-quoted) values to follow the standard part rather than the optional one.As you state the Sika data shows the VVX20 standard model to have a specified flow range of 5 to 80 lpm, whereas the optional extra flow meter PAC-FS01-E detailed in the Ecodan manual would appear to have a specified flow range of 5 to 100 lpm.Posted by: @derek-m
In any case, setting the FTC max flow rate to match the part's installed, as advised in the manual, reduces the value being read!?
That's a good shout.The output from both flow meters is stated to be 0.5 volts dc at 5 lpm and 3.5 volts dc at full range. By measuring the dc voltage output from the flow meter under steady flow conditions it should be possible to ascertain which of the ranges most accurately matches your analogue flow meter. Sika claim the accuracy to be +/- 0.75% at flow rates below 50% of full range.
It was a third party's; I don't have that information to hand now.What analogue flow meter are you using as a reference? What is its range and accuracy?
Indeed - in limited testing it seems to have made a hugh difference to the delivered kWs being reported! I guess, as long as the flow rate settings remain constant, the relative values are most important over the year.I believe that the flow rate measurement may be used in estimating the thermal energy output of the heat pump, but this tends not to be too accurate on most heat pumps.
A vortex flowmeter is actually measuring the velocity of the liquid passing through it, which coupled with the actual area through which the liquid is passing allows the volume to be calculated.
There are recommendations as to how and where a flowmeter should be installed. Have these recommendations been followed?
Without knowing the details and specified accuracy of the analogue flowmeter, how do you know which flowmeter, if any, is providing an accurate reading. When testing any measuring device, the reference instrument should be at least 3 times more accurate than the device under test.
I would suggest that you make a note of the various controller settings before making any changes. You could then change the range from 0 to 100 lpm to 0 to 80 lpm and see how this affects the system operation.
@derek-m The man with a watch is confident he knows the time -the man with two watches … is never quite sure.😉
Toodles, he heats his home with cold draughts and cooks his food with magnets.
Posted by: @rhh2348The Mitsubishi manual states "*18 Do not change the [2 x flow] setting since it is set according to the specification of flow sensor attached to the hydrobox."
The Sika sensor states its range is "5..80 l/m".
The manual is quite explicit that it is set for the flow meter supplied ... and the Sika sensor says it only measures up to 80l/min - but if you look at the other side of the sensor you will see printed:
Pin2: U flow 0.5...3.5V
5...100l/min
So the maximum voltage would correspond to 100l/min, which is what you are telling the unit software it should work to. It won't ever get near that signal level as the pump supplied tops out at around 25l/min.
The unit will shut down if certain paramenters are exceeded, including being out of the acceptable flow rate range, so adjusting the values the software ascribes to the signal from the flow meter may have unintended consequences.
Mitsubishi EcoDan 8.5 kW ASHP - radiators on a single loop
210l Mitsubishi solar tank
Solar thermal
3.94kW of PV
It's on the return before the mag filter so I assume so.There are recommendations as to how and where a flowmeter should be installed. Have these recommendations been followed?Posted by: @derek-m
Good points.Without knowing the details and specified accuracy of the analogue flowmeter, how do you know which flowmeter, if any, is providing an accurate reading. When testing any measuring device, the reference instrument should be at least 3 times more accurate than the device under test.
Yep, already done/doing - though it feels like the effects on readings (e.g. lower delivered kWs, reduced HP power) are downw to FTC calculations rather than physical differences. Will continue to vary + test and see what happens.I would suggest that you make a note of the various controller settings before making any changes. You could then change the range from 0 to 100 lpm to 0 to 80 lpm and see how this affects the system operation.
[Edit: removed Pin2 commentary as I've just seen @harriup's post!]
Is the pump controlled to be variable speed? A second plug connected?Posted by: @Anonymous
It can be controlled using PWM (profile A), yes, but we don't have a 2nd plug connected at present.
Not sure but believe the circulation pump speed is modulated to help manage dT. Sitting stationary may not do anything other than fixed speed.
I think this is the next area I'm headed to following testing, which I'm at the tail end of. I've gone through all pump modes and (set) speeds to get closest to an optimal combination of: dT of 5, best CoP, power output, reheat speed, etc. (More to follow).
I've seen on mine it modulates the compressor down a little, and infrequently, to seemingly-achieve this, but can anyone confirm they have experienced the FTC6 adjusting pump speed to optimise running operation (e.g. slow down flow C increases / increase dT)?
Furthermore, does anyone know how a Grundfos UPM3 would operate if under PWM control - does it map FTC speed 1 to lowest pump flow and speed 5 to highest and step up and down, or is it more-variable on the l/m??
Posted by: @rhh2348speeds to get closest to an optimal combination of: dT of 5, best CoP, power output, reheat speed,
My heat pump is a variable speed circulation pump, but it seems to do what you don't expect.
It doesn't seem to run a fixed dT. One of the issues is the heat pump tries it's hardest to stay running once it has started.
It initially runs full load to get the dT as close to target as it can. Then then back off, as return temps come back warmer it adds heat to try and get to target flow temp and keep dT stable. There will an overshoot hysterisis, it then starts working in that range. If it kept at dT that range gets consumed quite quickly (if running below min modulation). So it allows dT to reduce a little by increasing flow rate.
This is a run I noted when doing some commissioning
14 degs OAT
Target flow temp 27 overshoot hysterisis 0.4.t
50 sec into start 26.4 degs flow
90 sec 26.7 degs flow
At 2 mins down to 26.6 reduces load at 2.5 mins temp at 26.7
3.5 min at 27
4 mins 26.9 dT 4.9
5 mins 26.9
6 mins 27 dT 4.7 0.964 m³
7 min 27.1 dT 4.6 0.973m³
8 min 27.2 dT 4.6 1.021 m³
9 min 27.3 dT 4.4 1.02 m³
10 min 27.3 dt 4.3 1.03 m³
11 min 27.4 dT 4.4 1.036 m³
11.5 min trips
@johnmo
I think you will find that your results indicate the following.
All control systems have limits within which they can operate correctly, but once you go outside those limits then the control system can no longer perform correctly.
Within your controller it would appear that there are two individual control loops, one varies the compressor speed to produce the required LWT and also supply the thermal energy demand, while the other varies the water pump speed to produce the desired DT.
On start-up the controller senses that the LWT is below the desired value, so runs the compressor faster to produce more thermal energy. As the LWT starts to increase it creates a DT between LWT and RWT, but there will be a limit as to how high the LWT can increase until the RWT also starts to increase. As the LWT and RWT start to warm up, the controller starts to reduce the compressor speed and thermal energy output as it senses that the system is warming up. It would appear that the controller pulled back the compressor to its minimum operating speed.
Because the heat pump is still producing more thermal energy than that being emitted by the heat emitters, the net effect is that the RWT continues to increase, which in turn causes the DT to reduce and the LWT also to increase.
The LWT controller has now reached its minimum operating limit, so can no longer prevent the LWT from increasing. The DT controller has also reached its operating limit and can no longer maintain the DT at 5C, but now appears to be increasing the flow rate to try to prevent the LWT from continuing to increase. This it can do for a limited period of time, but because the heat pump is still producing more thermal energy than is required, the LWT continues to increase until it reaches the high limit and stops the heat pump.
- 22 Forums
- 2,073 Topics
- 45.5 K Posts
- 64 Online
- 3,353 Members
Join Us!
Trusted Installers
Struggling to find a reliable heat pump installer? A poor installation can lead to inefficiencies and high running costs. We now connect homeowners with top-rated installers who deliver quality work and excellent service.
✅ Verified, trusted & experienced installers
✅ Nationwide coverage expanding
✅ Special offers available
Latest Posts
-
RE: Solar Power Output – Let’s Compare Generation Figures
Well we finished this month with an all time record! Ev...
By Andris , 10 hours ago
-
RE: 5 Star Service from Havenwise
Oh good! I was wondering when/if you might pick them ...
By Transparent , 12 hours ago
-
RE: Air Changes per Hour - ACH and the MCS requirement
update - my old installer insisted on a heat loss of 11...
By MatWin , 14 hours ago
-
I agree it's not very helpful. Generally, the max heat ...
By Old_Scientist , 16 hours ago
-
RE: Commencing on an ASHP Installation Process
I think therein lies the problem. Ratio of quotes to i...
By JamesPa , 2 days ago
-
RE: Why Your MCS-Certified Installer Might Not Be As Competent As You Think
Hive and most other smart thermostats don't play well w...
By JamesPa , 2 days ago
-
RE: Enabling WiFi: Samsung ASHP on Smart Things App
Thanks for the input. I've been running various experim...
By Grahamh-uk , 2 days ago
-
RE: Radiators downstairs are cooler at the bottom after ASHP install
@melonbuffet Hi, this sounds great is you are getting 5...
By ASHP-BOBBA , 2 days ago
-
RE: Ripped Off: How UK Homeowners Are Paying Gas Prices for Wind Energy
I believe there's another reason that network upgrades ...
By Transparent , 2 days ago
-
RE: What’s the modern take on advised types of insulation?
@jeff I am sorry @jeff if I have misunderstood what you...
By Toodles , 3 days ago
-
RE: Getting the best out of a heat pump - is Homely a possible answer?
@editor Cobbler’s Mantra that!
By Toodles , 3 days ago
-
RE: Renewables & Heat Pumps in the News
Australia Blue, the first wind farm in Western Victoria...
By Morgan , 4 days ago
-
RE: Flow rate discrepancy between ASHP and manifold
That's useful thanks, I hadn't seen that table before. ...
By AshRolls , 4 days ago
-
In principle I agree, @johnmo, but with provisos. The...
By Majordennisbloodnok , 5 days ago
-
RE: Heat pump installation and BUS Grant timings
@jamespa Thats how I understood it too. 🙂
By ASHP-BOBBA , 5 days ago
-
RE: Antifreeze top up for my heat pump - is this a rip off?
@sallyl That sounds about right if they are re-filling ...
By Brendon Uys , 5 days ago
-
I wouldn't be so sure about that. Heat pump designers ...
By JamesPa , 5 days ago
-
RE: Jokes and fun posts about heat pumps and renewables
@toodles they're a rowdy bunch!
By Mars , 6 days ago
-
RE: Home energy storage & battery register
@jamespa To a certain extent, by exporting to the grid ...
By Toodles , 6 days ago