Controversial opini...
 
Notifications
Clear all

Controversial opinions - pure weather compensation, buffer tank, heat loss, oversized heat pumps

18 Posts
8 Users
4 Reactions
392 Views
(@jamespa)
Famed Member Moderator
8482 kWhs
Joined: 2 years ago
Posts: 1491
 

Posted by: @stuartornum

This leaves installers in an interesting position... with Homely providing arguably the best controls (that you can buy) in the market (IMHO), couple that with a Midea/Riello/Samsung etc... why bother with the "premium" brands such as Vaillant, Viessmann, Stiebel Eltron etc... I mean, Riello is owned by the same parent as Viessmann (Carrier).

Thats a fair observation, although some of the 'cheaper' brands (eg Samsung) with very basic controllers seem to have caught up in price certainly with Vaillant. Whether that's price gouging or a retail price which differs dramatically from the price to installers I cant say.  It would probably be perfect for installers and consumers if the market split into heat pumps and flow temperature controllers, so you could pick the two individually according to the situation and also so installers dont have to cope with very different interfaces, but I doubt that will happen.

Ideal is an interesting brand also.  Well established in UK with (like Vaillant) a large existing field network,  clearly a strength if you want to get into the market.  Their R32 model looked suspiciously like a Mitsubishi, albeit with their own controller.  I'm reliably told that their R290 model is Midea; I don't know if it has the same (Ideal) controller as the R32 but I do know its modbus compatible so presumably could work with Homely - possibly not ideal for Ideal.  I'm not sure where that leaves Freedom, who up till now appear to have effectively been Midea UK.

The market still has a long way to go before its anything like mature.  Its a pity that the 'grant harvesters' are damaging the reputation of both the technology and the industry.  Of course it may be a minority of installations that go sour; people who are happy with their installations tend just to get on with their lives so we probably don't hear much from them!

This post was modified 6 days ago by JamesPa

   
👍
1
ReplyQuote
SUNandAIR
(@sunandair)
Prominent Member Member
3052 kWhs
Joined: 2 years ago
Posts: 411
 

Hi @stuartornum 

“ When it's -3c and you have a 300L cylinder, it'll take at least 2.5 hours to heat the tank to ~55c. That's 2.5 hours your house has no heating. If you size the HP for your heat loss, it will struggle to get the house back up to temperature.

3. Bigger heat pumps generally have better COP figures.”

you can obviously extrapolate figures to the worst case scenario. But your post,which is addressing ‘Mr & Mrs Confused’ appears to imply it’s a typical situation when it clearly is not.

I have a 8.5kwh heat pump and a 250 ltr cylinder it takes 45 minutes to take the thermistor up to 48c (why go to 55c) the top-of-the-tank thermistor is usually 5 or 6c hotter.

Regarding over sized Heat Pumps it’s not a good idea at all. If for only one reason the bigger the Heat Pump - the bigger and earlier the cycling. Our moderate climate means a he highest number of days the HP has to operate above +8c outdoor ambient. Larger heat pumps have a larger minimum output so will cycle earlier.

 


   
ReplyQuote
(@raiph)
Trusted Member Member
216 kWhs
Joined: 4 months ago
Posts: 25
 

@sunandair Bigger heat pumps with bigger loads. Don't forget about the pipework and flow rates. The more powerfull the HP the higher the flow rate required. Samsung 5kW - -2 degrees, 35 WO flow required to deliver 5460W is 14.3 lpm. 8K unit - 22.3 lpm to deliver 8240W. 12K unit 33 lpm to deliver 12360W. So pipe sizing and layout are critical. As flow rate increases so does pressure loss. Don't forget all other system components - higher flow rates - higher pressure loss. Most installers just look at the pipework - should be OK. Remember that the HP is just one of many components.


   
ReplyQuote



SUNandAIR
(@sunandair)
Prominent Member Member
3052 kWhs
Joined: 2 years ago
Posts: 411
 

@raiph yes…. And with higher flow rates comes potential for background noise. But I must admit I don’t know much about pressure loss. 👍

Is this what you mean 

61DF50FC 5A5D 4BD9 B3AC 6417EC6BC25F
This post was modified 3 days ago by SUNandAIR

   
ReplyQuote
(@raiph)
Trusted Member Member
216 kWhs
Joined: 4 months ago
Posts: 25
 

Look at pressure-drop.online.


   
ReplyQuote
(@benson)
Estimable Member Member
720 kWhs
Joined: 9 months ago
Posts: 67
 

Posted by: @stuartornum

Posted by: @toodles

Sounds rather like what my Homely controller does right now! Regards, Toodles.

Big fan of Homely! One of the reasons being... it's not pure weather comp, it uses room influence.

I have Homely on my setup, currently turned off as it doesn't play well with other devices being on the modbus (floods it). I've asked Homely several times for an API... fingers crossed.

I believe Homely is in the best position to be v2.0 for weather comp. Here's some features/data I'd like to see added:

1. An API (a local API would be even better)
2. Multiple zones (I know people are against zones generally, but the feature would still be nice)
3. Ability to change max/min flow temps without having to call them and ask them to make the change manually (I believe this feature is coming)
4. Release anonymised performance data of heat pumps
5. Ability to use different sensors, for example it uses the OAT of the HP itself... which may be in direct sunlight... I'd like to push my own OAT to Homely.
6. Ability to dynamically change the heat requirement
7. I don't believe they ask for the properties heat loss, they may determine this themselves over time based on the heat requirements... I'd like to be able to modify this dynamically (via the API)

That is really interesting what you mentioned about contacting homely directly to change max/min flow temps.

Our installers [allegedly] designed our system at 45C. I noticed when the homely was installed that it had the maximum set (or defaulted?) at 50 which I have constantly been querying with the installers who insist their design and heat losses are correct.

I had some isolated instances where it would seemingly overshoot in Oct/Nov so my installers contacted them and set it back to 46C. The installers told me that this was due to a software fault but again I do not believe that this is accurate- I think they simply called them and asked for it to be set back to stop me complaining. Cue cold weather and it wasn't sufficient to get the house to 20.5 (our set indoor target temp). I had to contact homely who put it back to 50C, said it needs to be at that set point to heat the house sufficiently, and no issues since. Generally COP in coldest weather at 45 was 2.75. Now it is around 2.55 when set at 50 so all in all I'll take the warmer house...

The red herring I believe is the design temp rather than anything to do with homely. I believe that we've been mis-sold that element and was highly sceptical when the installers said that it would be that low, taking into account their proposed emitter changes, and our house not being particularly well insulated. But, when is this max flow temp even set? The installers said there's no option to select or change this when commissioning; indeed the installer app does not allow for this to be changed as you say.

I don't get why they'd even set up the controls in this way to force you to call them when this needs tweaking. The chap from Homely who called me the other day (in response to the max flow temp issue) said he can't keep up with demand and enquiries. I do like Homely but I dislike things like this which seem as though they can be easily solved...also seems odd they have a load of end users on a forum like this, posting reviews on the app stores etc but they don't provide any feedback via any of these platforms. That might be helpful...

 


   
ReplyQuote
Page 2 / 2



Share:

Join Us!

Latest Posts

Members Online

 No online members at the moment

x  Powerful Protection for WordPress, from Shield Security
This Site Is Protected By
Shield Security