Infrared heating
Hi, I hope this can help you 🙂
I have found two studies from Aston University and Wolverhampton University as part of the European Union Regional Development Fund.
The Wolverhampton study is developing the building simulation of a newly built two-bedroom house.
report found that ASHP have a lower output than the gas boiler and IR floor heating. Meaning they cannot deliver heat as quickly as the IR heating system.
Further to this, the efficiency of gas boilers reduces with age. As does an ASHP. They must be maintained. Air temperature affects the energy coefficient of the system. The lower temperatures cause a reduction in the efficiency. However, there is no drop in efficiency from an IR heater.
The release of the Heat and Buildings Strategy outlined how the government aims for a ‘heat pump first’ approach. As part of the transition to adopt low carbon efficient heating systems. However, the EnTRESS report, building further upon existing research on the efficiency of Infrared Heating Panels, has firmly shown infrared to be a viable and, in some cases, more efficient alternative to ASHP.
Aston-
Wolverhampton- https://www.jigsawinfrared.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/entress-document_compressed-2.pdf
Posted by: @hannahHi, I hope this can help you 🙂
I have found two studies from Aston University and Wolverhampton University as part of the European Union Regional Development Fund.
The Wolverhampton study is developing the building simulation of a newly built two-bedroom house.
report found that ASHP have a lower output than the gas boiler and IR floor heating. Meaning they cannot deliver heat as quickly as the IR heating system.
Further to this, the efficiency of gas boilers reduces with age. As does an ASHP. They must be maintained. Air temperature affects the energy coefficient of the system. The lower temperatures cause a reduction in the efficiency. However, there is no drop in efficiency from an IR heater.
The release of the Heat and Buildings Strategy outlined how the government aims for a ‘heat pump first’ approach. As part of the transition to adopt low carbon efficient heating systems. However, the EnTRESS report, building further upon existing research on the efficiency of Infrared Heating Panels, has firmly shown infrared to be a viable and, in some cases, more efficient alternative to ASHP.
Aston-
Wolverhampton- https://www.jigsawinfrared.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/entress-document_compressed-2.pdf
Reading this report does not fill me with confidence about how the students are being taught at our universities. Basically the report proves that an infrared panel heater can heat a room quicker than a standard electric convection heater or an electric storage heater.
Such measurements over such short time periods are quite meaningless in the context of heating a home throughout the year.
In terms of full disclosure @Hannah does work for an infrared heating company so this is a planted post. Any further promotional posts will be deleted.
Buy Bodge Buster – Homeowner Air Source Heat Pump Installation Guide: https://amzn.to/3NVndlU
From Zero to Heat Pump Hero: https://amzn.to/4bWkPFb
Subscribe and follow our Homeowners’ Q&A heat pump podcast
Posted by: @derek-mPosted by: @hannahHi, I hope this can help you 🙂
I have found two studies from Aston University and Wolverhampton University as part of the European Union Regional Development Fund.
The Wolverhampton study is developing the building simulation of a newly built two-bedroom house.
report found that ASHP have a lower output than the gas boiler and IR floor heating. Meaning they cannot deliver heat as quickly as the IR heating system.
Further to this, the efficiency of gas boilers reduces with age. As does an ASHP. They must be maintained. Air temperature affects the energy coefficient of the system. The lower temperatures cause a reduction in the efficiency. However, there is no drop in efficiency from an IR heater.
The release of the Heat and Buildings Strategy outlined how the government aims for a ‘heat pump first’ approach. As part of the transition to adopt low carbon efficient heating systems. However, the EnTRESS report, building further upon existing research on the efficiency of Infrared Heating Panels, has firmly shown infrared to be a viable and, in some cases, more efficient alternative to ASHP.
Aston-
Wolverhampton- https://www.jigsawinfrared.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/entress-document_compressed-2.pdf
Reading this report does not fill me with confidence about how the students are being taught at our universities. Basically the report proves that an infrared panel heater can heat a room quicker than a standard electric convection heater or an electric storage heater.
Such measurements over such short time periods are quite meaningless in the context of heating a home throughout the year.
Some of the major house builders are currently trialing IR heating as an alternative to gas boilers and ASHPs in real life situations.
These trials should give an idea of real world running costs and effectiveness
@editor I would assume she works for Jigsaw infrared. Given both papers are hosted, by a firm selling infrared heating... a pinch of salt is required. They would hardly be promoting studies which show their technology isn't as good.
Redrow is one of the companies trialing an IR based solution including solar and batteries.
We have a panel in our bathroom which works well but it is obviously only a small space. No experience about heating a whole home and the potential efficiency and effectiveness. Of course doesn't benefit from the efficiency of a heat pump.
Will be interesting to see if there is any traction in solutions like this for new builds. Feels rather niche without knowing more.
@hannah, the report is interesting and I must say I only skimmed through, however a few points jump out at me.
- With IR you still need DHW, so the report assumes they just use immersion.
-
The report shows that the IR system has the highest running cost, even excluding RHI (page 14)
- The assumptions made for Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) are fairly outlandish - for example they state that a new ASHP or Gas boiler will be replaced every 10 years! Every 10?! But the IR system is nearly double that. No valid explanation is given for that assumption. I can only assume its to raise the cost for the systems lifetime
There is some very dodgy maths going on with page 16 which outlines these costs. The document states that the IR panels have a running cost of £639 per annum and the ASHP a cost of £494 without RHI or £247 with RHI (assuming the same unit price per annum).
However when they come to calculate the cost of ownership they seem to double count and get the maths straight wrong.
The cost to run the ASHP according to them should be (£494.33 * 43 years) + (£274.33 * 7 years) = 43 years no RHI and 7 years with RHI = £23,176
Adding this to other ASHP costs (£11,500, £500 for service and £26,000 for (questionable) replacement) install stated we get £61,176 HOWEVER in the document this is £65,676 - £5k more. Not sure why? If I wanted to make the prices match I could just Goal Seek in excel, doing so gives me 2.3 replacements plus the original install, or 3.3 ASHPs or 1 ASHP every 15 years. However I would note the new install costs are equal to the original which doesn't seem correct. You would not need any of the ground work, just a new ASHP unit to be dropped in. Even with the gas boiler this calculation assumes all of the radiators are replaced?! every 10 years? Its fair to say replacing an ASHP unit is more or less a drop in replacement with some work on draining the system etc. The report assumes a cost of £4000 for a new unit, so that plus labour would be a better guess. By assuming that and being generous with £1000 labour we now get a TCO of £46k which is actually less than the IR TCO which is £49k. I show this as its easy to make these kind of calculations say whatever you want, by making assumptions which end up directing you.
The graph below (page 16) is also misleading as the categories haven't been assigned correctly. The replacement cost for the IR panels seems to have been mislabelled, as this is in fact the running cost and should be orange and not yellow. The current orange is the replacement cost, not the running costs.
this is after only a quick scan of the document. I am sure if I actually looked in depth I might find other discrepancies.
Posted by: @hannahHi @derek-m
Did you read both reports?
The Wolverhampton report goes into much more detail about comparing heat pumps as well.
Yes, I have read both reports in detail.
Like Batalto I find many of the assumptions made in the report to be quite questionable.
In particular, the data shown in Figure 10, detailing energy consumption.
Based upon the stated gas boiler efficiency of 89.5% and a total gas consumption of 3386 kWh for heating, the heating demand for the property would be approximately 3030 kWh.
Using this figure it would mean that if the ASHP consumed 1800 kWh to produce 3030 kWh of heat energy, it would be operating at a SCOP of only 1.68, which is even less than the assumed value of 2 stated within the text. Modern ASHP's often achieve a SCOP of 3 or above, so a more realistic consumption figure for the ASHP scenario would be slightly over 1000 kWh.
The data for the IR panels states an energy consumption of 1840 kWh to produce the required 3030 kWh of heat energy, which would indicate an efficiency of approximately 164%. I would be interested to know how this is achieved, since it is not adequately explained within the text.
@derek-m to get the RHI you need an SCOP of 2.7 or above - so that should be the baseline minimum
@hannah you can sign whatever you like - but I see no evidence source linking the age of the replacement in real life? Why 10 years? Also everything would be inflation linked, but I note this assumes no lowering of costs for ASHPs nor taking into account you cant actually replace the gas boiler in 10 years, as they won't be sold anymore. If anything I would say the report is questionable given the points we have pointed out - incorrect calculations and graphs do not fill me with confidence that the report has been proofed and vetted thoroughly.
I would also note that the RHI requires an SCOP of 2.7 or greater - so using 2 in the report means that you cannot get the RHI.
Finally I would say, I have a battery and Solar PV - these would also lower the running cost of an ASHP as well as any IR system.
It is not on us, as a reader to provide evidence to support the reports you pointed us towards. But on you to show your evidence is valid.
- 22 Forums
- 2,078 Topics
- 45.6 K Posts
- 76 Online
- 3,365 Members
Join Us!
Trusted Installers
Struggling to find a reliable heat pump installer? A poor installation can lead to inefficiencies and high running costs. We now connect homeowners with top-rated installers who deliver quality work and excellent service.
✅ Verified, trusted & experienced installers
✅ Nationwide coverage expanding
✅ Special offers available
Latest Posts
-
RE: Radiators downstairs are cooler at the bottom after ASHP install
@melonbuffet Hi Melon, I would just concentrate on bala...
By ASHP-BOBBA , 3 hours ago
-
RE: Getting the best out of a heat pump - is Homely a possible answer?
@transparent and @toodles of course. Forgot I could att...
By benson , 4 hours ago
-
-
-
RE: All your heat pump problems solved by -- a plate heat exchanger in a plinth!
@allyfish As you say, all the ‘plus points’ and ‘advant...
By Toodles , 2 days ago
-
RE: Say hello and introduce yourself
I think my trouble is that I could easily write a whole...
By Transparent , 2 days ago
-
RE: Renewable Heating Hub Homeowners' Q&A Podcast
In our latest episode, we hand the mic to four homeowne...
By Mars , 4 days ago
-
RE: Forum updates, announcements & issues
@andrewj I’m currently away and only back this weekend....
By Mars , 4 days ago
-
RE: Help Stop the MCS Heat Pump Monopoly
Response sent. Thank you for highlighting the document...
By Sheriff Fatman , 4 days ago
-
RE: I worry I've messed my Samsung settings up somehow
Yes , this time of year . Unfortuneately I dont have ...
By Alfapat , 4 days ago
-
RE: Feasible solutions to expand existing Sunsynk battery capacity
Ours is a loft installation, which is where both invert...
By Sheriff Fatman , 4 days ago
-
RE: 5 Star Service from Havenwise
@sheriff-fatman Exactly this is why a lot of our users ...
By HCas , 5 days ago
-
RE: Solar Thermal DHW and ASHP
I'm beginning to think solar thermal is something that ...
By Alex_N , 5 days ago
-
RE: Commencing on an ASHP Installation Process
I received the BUS Grant permission email yesterday eve...
By Sheriff Fatman , 5 days ago
-
RE: Solar Power Output – Let’s Compare Generation Figures
510kWh of solar PV from my 4kW Hyundai panels and SMA S...
By JulianC , 1 week ago
-
RE: Is my Samsung heat pump working too well?
Thats in itself is interesting. I have a Vaillant heat...
By JamesPa , 1 week ago
-
RE: Jokes and fun posts about heat pumps and renewables
@transparent Not a swell season then ☹️
By Toodles , 1 week ago
-
RE: Air Changes per Hour - ACH and the MCS requirement
update - my old installer insisted on a heat loss of 11...
By MatWin , 1 week ago
-
I agree it's not very helpful. Generally, the max heat ...
By Old_Scientist , 1 week ago
-
RE: Why Your MCS-Certified Installer Might Not Be As Competent As You Think
Hive and most other smart thermostats don't play well w...
By JamesPa , 1 week ago