Notifications
Clear all

Who's your electricity provider and what's your tariff?

545 Posts
46 Users
331 Reactions
99.3 K Views
Transparent
(@transparent)
Illustrious Member Moderator
Joined: 4 years ago
Posts: 2446
 

Posted by: @old_scientist

Is it best to cycle daily on a 80-20-80% regime

That's what most people do if the system offers such a configuration.

 

Posted by: @old_scientist

and how does the charge / discharge rate affect the battery given it can charge at 1.7kW, 3.3kW or 5kW?

There's an obvious risk of damage due to over-charging if your inverter/charger is permitted to reach the 100% level whilst still delivering maximum current.

It's best if the charger successively reduces the current as it approaches 90%.
But very few do this...
... even if the inverter manufacturer has stated that his product 'is compatible with' your chosen battery unit.

Whether the BMS can offer protection will depend on how much current it can shift away from the cells that reach their peak-voltage first.
Most BMS units are passive. They detect the cell with the highest voltage and burn off some of this using a resistor.

I prefer active BMS units, which take energy from the cell with the highest voltage, and deliver it to that with the lowest voltage.

 

If the general public were better informed on such matters, then I'd expect the inverter/charger manufacturers to include a reduced-current feature when approaching maximum charge.

But there are very few consumers who would even understand the meaning of such a feature if it appeared on the specification sheet.
Useful Energy Technology is being held back by lack of knowledge.

Save energy... recycle electrons!


   
👍
1
ReplyQuote
Toodles
(@toodles)
Illustrious Member Contributor
Joined: 3 years ago
Posts: 2046
 

@transparent Don’t know about other manufacturer’s offerings but in the case of the Tesla Powerwalls, the app indicates that once charging reaches the 90% level, the charging rate reduces and tails off completely as the battery reaches 100%. In my own case, with a 27KWh system, charging runs at ~10 KW and upon reaching the 90% level, starts dropping so that by the time it reaches ~95%, it has dropped to ~3.5 - 4 KW. and continues to drop further as it reaches close to full up.

Regards, Toodles.

Toodles, he heats his home with cold draughts and cooks his food with magnets.


   
👍
1
ReplyQuote
Transparent
(@transparent)
Illustrious Member Moderator
Joined: 4 years ago
Posts: 2446
 

That's the sort of good design we would expect from Tesla @toodles.

There is another reason why an inverter/charger should incorporate current limiting
... it's better for the grid.

If a home battery is to be recharged from the grid, then we don't want sudden on/off surges... especially at the start of a cheap-rate period.
Inverters should ramp-up their demand on the grid over several minutes, allowing time for NESO to adjust their draw from the available mix of energy sources.

RampUpDown

The red line shows an inverter ramping up the current it draws from the grid in twelve steps over a period of about 5 minutes.

The blue line has been superimposed, and shows the voltage measured at the battery terminals as a consequence.

Save energy... recycle electrons!


   
👍
1
ReplyQuote



(@old_scientist)
Reputable Member Member
Joined: 1 year ago
Posts: 203
 

Posted by: @toodles

@transparent Don’t know about other manufacturer’s offerings but in the case of the Tesla Powerwalls, the app indicates that once charging reaches the 90% level, the charging rate reduces and tails off completely as the battery reaches 100%. In my own case, with a 27KWh system, charging runs at ~10 KW and upon reaching the 90% level, starts dropping so that by the time it reaches ~95%, it has dropped to ~3.5 - 4 KW. and continues to drop further as it reaches close to full up.

Regards, Toodles.

Same here @toodles, my single PW3 can charge at upto 5kW, and as it approaches 100% I see the rate fall off, sometimes only charging at a few hundred watts once it gets to 99%.

@transparent  is it generally better for battery health to charge slowly (say at 2kW) or flat out at 5kW (other than the last few percent, as previously discussed), or is that going to make little difference to the lifespan of the cells (the important thing being the last few percent, not to overcharge)? I try to encourage mine to charge slowly so that more of the input power can be met by DC-coupled solar, and thus minimise any AC to DC conversion losses from grid charging, but that's more about maximising efficiency and minimising conversion losses than lifespan of the battery.

 

Samsung 12kW gen6 ASHP with 50L volumiser and all new large radiators. 7.2kWp solar (south facing), Tesla PW3 (13.5kW)
Solar generation completely offsets ASHP usage annually. We no longer burn ~1600L of kerosene annually.


   
ReplyQuote
Toodles
(@toodles)
Illustrious Member Contributor
Joined: 3 years ago
Posts: 2046
 

@old_scientist There is an option in the Tesla app that controls the grid charge and can be set to ‘off’ if required which would ensure that only your very productive solar array charges the PW3. Regards, Toodles.

Toodles, he heats his home with cold draughts and cooks his food with magnets.


   
👍
1
ReplyQuote
Page 46 / 46



Share:

Join Us!

Latest Posts

Members Online

Click to access the login or register cheese
x  Powerful Protection for WordPress, from Shield Security
This Site Is Protected By
ShieldPRO