Flow rate vs emitter 'openness', and CoP?
Struggling to get my head round this so grateful of others' thoughts:
Assuming the flow rate is fixed, and that lower flow rates (between 8 and 11L/m) still allow sufficient flow around all my emitters, am I correct in thinking a higher flow rate (14 - 17L/m) and more-closed emitters are preferable rather than the other way round?
It seems my system reports a higher CoP when I run in this way - I assume this means I can run at lower flow temps too, as the dT is smaller / the return temp is higher relative to the flow temp, and a higher flow rate allows the return temp to remain closer to the flow temp, and therefore reduces heating (and therefore power usage) and cycling.
My logical assumption would be a lower flow rate and more open UFH loops because more heat can be absorbed by the screed, but a higher flow rate for rads as it achieves higher mid-point temp, but I'm not sure why/if it's any different between emitter types nor how to determine the flow temp/rate 'tipping point', as it were.
In summary, if I had the choice of a lower flow rate and opening up the emitters more, or a higher flow rate and them being more closed, which should theoretically be better for efficiency / reducing flow temps / cycling?
In another post, @jamespa wrote:
Yes!"In summary, if I had the choice of a lower flow rate and opening up the emitters more, or a higher flow rate and them being more closed, which should theoretically be better for efficiency / reducing flow temps / cycling?"Im not sure you really have the free choice or what you are assuming is kept constant/varied in the two scenarios
Im assuming that you want to keep the heat output from the emitters constant, to preserve the room temperatures.
Well, I guess slightly-more nuianced - see below.
The lower flow temp constraint (in bold) is useful to know, and noted - thank you.The heat output from the emitters is determined by the difference between the average emitter temperature and IAT, not directly by flow rate.However if you can increase the flow rate through the emitters you will reduce the deltaT across the emitters which means that the average temperature is closer to the flow temperature, which in turn means that the flow temperature can be lower (but only by a degree or so) for a given average emitter temperature.
That makes sense as you've explained it.This will be more efficient and is one of the reasons we operate heat pumps at a lower deltaT (across emitters) than boilers.
Noted. I have read elsewhere that rads generally require a different flow rate to UFH loops (and if so, why - if they are the same diameter pipework?) - is this just in essence the same as flow-rate-to-emitter, whereby each UFH loop openness is adjusted to allow for required IAT?This answer is independent of the emitter type.
Perhaps a better way to have written it would be: "Flow rates + temps vs emitter 'openness', and CoP?" - thereby the question becomes "If the IAT can be maintained (or even raised?) by a higher flow rate, reduced flow temp (by up to 1deg C), and adjustment to emitter 'openness', which should result in the higher CoP/better system operation?"Does that answer the question?
or even: My logic says, if all UFH loops are more closed, less heated water is going round the loops and therefore the returning water is of a higher temperature and is therefore being 'wasted' / bypassing the emitters. If the dT were larger, the heater has to work harder to heat the LWT but more is being 'used'; which should be most-efficient?
Posted by: @rhh2348Noted. I have read elsewhere that rads generally require a different flow rate to UFH loops (and if so, why - if they are the same diameter pipework?) - is this just in essence the same as flow-rate-to-emitter, whereby each UFH loop openness is adjusted to allow for required IAT?
I guess that depends on where you measure it. If measured at the heat pump then the flow rate for any given heat transfer at any given deltaT (across emitters) is the same. If you measure it at the emitters then not so, because you generally have 10+ radiators and maybe 4-6 UFH loops. That said I dont know if you typically operate UFH at a lower deltaT even than radiators (it cant get much lower)!
Posted by: @rhh2348"If the IAT can be maintained (or even raised?) by a higher flow rate, reduced flow temp (by up to 1deg C), and adjustment to emitter 'openness', which should result in the higher CoP/better system operation?"
As always lower flow temperature = higher COP. However once you get down to UFH temperatures the effect gets smaller
.
Posted by: @rhh2348My logic says, if all UFH loops are more closed, less heated water is going round the loops and therefore the returning water is of a higher temperature and is therefore being 'wasted' / bypassing the emitters.
Qssuming you keep the flow temperature the same: If UFH loops are more closed the flow rate through the UFH will be less so the deltaT will be higher so the average temperature of the UFH will be lower so you emit less. The returning water is of a higher temperature but thats because the UFH emits less so the room will be colder.
Posted by: @rhh2348If the dT were larger, the heater has to work harder to heat the LWT but more is being 'used'; which should be most-efficient?
In principle the former for the reason stated
However, at low FTs the effect can be small and if its also a low loss house and mild weather than things like the consumption of the water pump become significant in comparison to the energy for actual heating. Also the effect of cycling may be important at this low output. At this point the simple thermodynamics-based arguments above break down and the engineering starts to matter. Whether anyone really cares at this level is a moot point, since the cost of heating is now very small!
4kW peak of solar PV since 2011; EV and a 1930s house which has been partially renovated to improve its efficiency. 7kW Vaillant heat pump.
- 26 Forums
- 2,208 Topics
- 48.7 K Posts
- 59 Online
- 5,868 Members
Join Us!
Podcast Picks
Latest Posts
-
RE: Inventor (Midea) Heat Pump short cycling advice
I installed the 80L tank (volumizer) things got better ...
By immunity , 2 hours ago
-
RE: Mitsubishi Ecodan F8 error
I absolutely love this. This is the quintessential heat...
By Mars , 9 hours ago
-
RE: Testing new controls/monitoring for Midea Clone ASHP
@papahuhu at the end of the day if you are happy with h...
By benson , 14 hours ago
-
RE: Can you recommend a Mitsubishi service engineer in the Rochdale area?
@dgclimatecontrol We'll all need annual servicing. How...
By Suzy-shadow , 14 hours ago
-
RE: Renewables & Heat Pumps in the News
@transparent I’ve understood your point now. The point ...
By Judith , 15 hours ago
-
RE: Octopus tariffs - a quick comparison
Does indeed need checking, @tim441. Neither Homely ...
By Majordennisbloodnok , 15 hours ago
-
RE: How not to install a heat pump
Delighted to hear that the buffer has been replumbed as...
By JamesPa , 16 hours ago
-
-
RE: Daikin 9kW to 8kW Swap Offer from Octopus
Yes but 9kW is similarly the 16kW derated. So 8kW subs...
By JamesPa , 18 hours ago
-
Actually, there's a rather greater degree of cattle-her...
By Majordennisbloodnok , 18 hours ago
-
RE: The Hidden Secret to a Successful Heat Pump: Pipe Size Matters
@davidnolan22 So far as I can tell from the 'other p...
By JamesPa , 22 hours ago
-
RE: 5 Star Service from Havenwise
I keep getting havenwise ads on my Facebook feed, so cl...
By benson , 1 day ago
-
Automation options to maximuse efficiency & ToU tariffs
I started a conversation with ChatGPT. What automation...
By Tim441 , 1 day ago
-
RE: 4 Year Ongoing Heat Pump Battle With Poor Heat Pump Installation
@jamespa Oh, I know some that are good and some not so....
By ASHP-BOBBA , 1 day ago
-
RE: Samsung Heat pump with Yonos Pico circulating pump running all the time
I don't know how many pumps you have but I guess it's o...
By JamesPa , 1 day ago
-
RE: Help me keep the faith with my air source heat pump installation
That's just human nature unfortunately, not special to ...
By JamesPa , 1 day ago
-
@bontwoody how long has it been now since you started t...
By Mars , 2 days ago
-
RE: Bosch CS5800i 5kW - Experience So Far
Yes, over the last few days I've been keeping a very cl...
By Steelbadger , 2 days ago
-
Absolutely. I am one of those members and I most certai...
By Majordennisbloodnok , 2 days ago